+1 877 705 191424 / 7
HIPAA Compliant
ISO 27001 Certified

Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 18Years +
All Genders
ID06958848

Study Comparing Small 16F and Large 24F Chest Drains After Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery for Cancer

Led by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Updated on 2026-05-06

124

Participants Needed

1

Research Sites

17 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating postoperative pain in patients undergoing minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy andor segmentectomy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC. The study compares the use of small-bore 16F chest drains to the standard large-bore 24F chest drains. It aims to determine if smaller chest tubes and earlier removal can reduce pain and improve recovery without compromising safety. This is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at a single center. Participants are assigned to one of four groups small-bore 16F chest tubes removed early 2 to 6 hours after surgery, small-bore tubes removed at standard time 1 day post-op, large-bore 24F tubes removed early, or large-bore tubes removed at standard time. The study monitors safety and feasibility of early chest drain removal and compares effects of tube size and timing on postoperative outcomes. During the study, pain levels are assessed multiple times within the first three days after surgery, at discharge, and during follow-ups at 30 and 180 days. Researchers also track analgesic use, duration of drainage, fluid output, hospital stay length, complications, rehospitalization, mortality, chronic pain, and quality of life. Participants can expect detailed monitoring and evaluations throughout hospitalization and at follow-up visits up to six months after surgery.

CONDITIONS

Brief Title

16F vs 24F Chest Drain After Minimally Invasive Lobectomy and/or Segmentectomy

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years +
All Genders

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Signed informed consent from the patient (all sexes and genders)
  • Age 18 years or older at time of study inclusion
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I to IV
  • Patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) suitable for minimally invasive surgery
  • Undergoing minimally invasive anatomical lung resections such as lobectomy, lobectomy with wedge resection, lobectomy combined with segmentectomy, segmentectomy with wedge resection, or bilobectomy under general anaesthesia
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Previous thoracic surgery on the same side within 3 months
  • Lung cancer complicated with pleural empyema
  • Chronic pain patients using opioids, gabapentin, or pregabalin
  • Current use of opiates or benzodiazepines
  • Congestive heart failure NYHA Class III or IV
  • Liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh Class B or C
  • Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis or eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders such as von Willebrand disease, Hemophilia, or thrombocytopenia (platelets below 50 G/l) requiring transfusion
  • Neuralgia
  • Chest pain at surgery site without painkillers measured by VAS while coughing greater than 10 mm
  • Unhealed rib fractures on side of surgery within last 3 months
  • Open anatomical lung resections including pneumonectomy
  • Insertion of two or more chest tubes
  • Need for patient-controlled intravenous or epidural anaesthesia
  • Patients who are intubated or sedated and unable to complete pain surveys

Research Team

H

Helga Bachmann, MSc Clinical Research

M

Makhmudbek Mallaev, MD

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here