Status:

COMPLETED

A Retrospective Review of Enseal Laparoscopic Vaginal Assisted Hysterectomy (LAVH) Versus Traditional LAVH

Lead Sponsor:

Womens Care

Collaborating Sponsors:

Ethicon Endo-Surgery

Conditions:

Benign Uterine Disease

Eligibility:

FEMALE

35-75 years

Brief Summary

Retrospective charts review from one surgeon to compare Group A- cases where the laparoscopic portion of the case used an EN\~SEAL device to Group B - the laparoscopic BSO was done using a 3mm EN-SEAL...

Detailed Description

79 women with benign uterine disease underwent laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Subjects charts were divided into two groups based on surgica...

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

  • none, observational study

Exclusion

  • none, observational study

Key Trial Info

Start Date :

August 1 2010

Trial Type :

OBSERVATIONAL

Allocation :

ACTUAL

End Date :

February 1 2011

Estimated Enrollment :

79 Patients enrolled

Trial Details

Trial ID

NCT01217866

Start Date

August 1 2010

End Date

February 1 2011

Last Update

December 20 2012

Active Locations (0)

Enter a location and click search to find clinical trials sorted by distance.

Page 1 of 0 (0 locations)

No Results Found

We couldn’t find results for the location/zipcode entered or within the selected range. Please check your input or adjust your search.

A Retrospective Review of Enseal Laparoscopic Vaginal Assisted Hysterectomy (LAVH) Versus Traditional LAVH | DecenTrialz