Status:
UNKNOWN
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
Lead Sponsor:
Cairo University
Conditions:
Removable Aligners, Conventional Brackets
Eligibility:
All Genders
16-40 years
Phase:
NA
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Clear aligners and Conventional braces for upper canine retraction (space closure) regarding canine tipping , anchorage loss and treatment time...
Detailed Description
Conventional fixed orthodontic treatment with metal brackets has been rejected by some adult patients because of esthetic and social concerns, but the demand for orthodontic treatment is currently inc...
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion
- 1\) Moderate to severe crowding orthodontic patients.( Irregularity index of \<5 mm)
- 2\) Good oral hygiene. (Patient with periodontally sound dentition).
- 3\) Patient in permanent dentition between the age range 16 - 40 years.
- 4\) .Patients requiring extraction of mandibular and maxillary first premolars;
- 5\) Patients having sound general health
Exclusion
- 1\) Systematic disease.
- 2\) Poor oral hygiene patients.
- 3 ) Periodontally affected teeth.
Key Trial Info
Start Date :
July 1 2020
Trial Type :
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation :
ESTIMATED
End Date :
January 1 2022
Estimated Enrollment :
10 Patients enrolled
Trial Details
Trial ID
NCT04333836
Start Date
July 1 2020
End Date
January 1 2022
Last Update
April 3 2020
Active Locations (1)
Enter a location and click search to find clinical trials sorted by distance.
1
Amr Mostafa Osman Ramadan
Cairo, Egypt, 11553