Status:

COMPLETED

the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance

Lead Sponsor:

Al-Azhar University

Conditions:

Class II Malocclusion

Eligibility:

All Genders

18-20 years

Phase:

PHASE2

PHASE3

Brief Summary

the objective of the current study is to compare the dentofacial effects of the mini-plate anchored Herbst appliance Versus the dentally anchored Twin force bite corrector Appliance in Young Adult Cla...

Detailed Description

Study design: Prospective randomized clinical study. Study setting and population: This study will be conducted on twenty orthodontic patients. The number of patients was dependent on a power study...

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

  • Participants will be selected based on the following inclusion criteria:
  • Skeletal class 2 malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion with increased overjet (SNA= 82±4, ANB=≥4°).
  • Mandibular arch with minimum (up to 4mm) or no crowding.
  • All permanent teeth are erupted (3rd molar not included).
  • Good oral and general health.
  • No systemic disease or regular medication that could interfere and/or affect orthodontic teeth movement.
  • No previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion

  • \- 1. Patients with a blocked-out tooth that will not allow for placement of the bracket at the initial bonding appointment.
  • 2\. Patients with untreated decay or any endodontic lesions.

Key Trial Info

Start Date :

September 10 2020

Trial Type :

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation :

ACTUAL

End Date :

April 15 2022

Estimated Enrollment :

20 Patients enrolled

Trial Details

Trial ID

NCT05440526

Start Date

September 10 2020

End Date

April 15 2022

Last Update

July 1 2022

Active Locations (1)

Enter a location and click search to find clinical trials sorted by distance.

Page 1 of 1 (1 locations)

1

Nasr city

Cairo, Egypt, 11311

the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance | DecenTrialz