Purse-string suture vs second intention healing: results of a randomized, blind clinical trial.
Jayne Joo, Trenton Custis, April W Armstrong...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25372450Actively Recruiting
Led by University of California, Davis · Updated on 2026-01-29
73
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
This research aims to compare two types of purse-string closures used to close circular surgical wounds: intra-dermal and transcutaneous. The study focuses on scar appearance and post-operative complications, using a split wound model where each participant's wound is closed by both methods on different halves. Researchers want to see if these two closure techniques result in similar cosmetic outcomes and safety profiles using validated scar assessment tools. Participants will have their surgical wounds closed with both techniques, one on each half of the wound, with the side assignments randomized. Intra-dermal purse-string closure involves placing sutures under the skin surface, while transcutaneous purse-string closure places sutures through the skin surface. Both are cinched like a coin purse to close the wound. This study uses a randomized, evaluator-blinded design to compare the effectiveness of these methods. Participants will be followed for three months post-surgery, during which the scars will be evaluated using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the trace-to-tape method to measure scar width. Researchers will also monitor and record any complications or adverse events during this time. The study requires participants to return for a follow-up visit to assess these outcomes and complete the study involvement.
CONDITIONS
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Single procedure day
Participants undergo surgical closure of their wound with two different purse-string suture techniques on opposite sides of the wound to compare outcomes.
1 surgical visit (in-person)
Duration - 3 months
Participants return for follow-up visits to assess scar appearance, width, and any complications from the closure methods.
Approximately 3 follow-up visits (in-person)
Total: 1 location
1
University of California, Davis - Dermatology Department
Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
Actively Recruiting
S
Salsala Nasim, BS
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
OTHER
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Jayne Joo, Trenton Custis, April W Armstrong...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25372450Lisa Scholl, Nina M Meier, Schapoor Hessam...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26788857Paolo Fioramonti, Valentina Sorvillo, Michele Maruccia...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29956469Sujin Park, Yeongjoo Oh, Jong Won Lee...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37041703Philip R Cohen, Paul T Martinelli, Keith E Schulze...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17614809Philip R Cohen, Paul T Martinelli, Keith E Schulze...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17442069Noah Kawika Weisberg, Steven S Greenbaum
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12786718Thomas K Lam, Christopher Lowe, Ryan Johnson...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26418684Edoardo Raposio, Michele Antonacci, Giorgia Caruana
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25142636