Epidemiology of scaphoid fractures and non-unions: A systematic review.
Peter Jørgsholm, Daniel Ossowski, Niels Thomsen...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32992390Actively Recruiting
Led by Herlev and Gentofte Hospital · Updated on 2023-03-01
88
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
104 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating two surgical methods for treating scaphoid delayed or non-union, a condition where a fractured wrist bone does not heal properly after several months. This trial focuses on adults aged 18 to 68 years who have scaphoid fractures that have not healed within 2 to 6 months with some displacement or over 6 months regardless of displacement, including those who have tried non-operative treatment. The study compares the time to bone union and functional outcomes between an arthroscopic-assisted graft reconstruction and an open graft reconstruction. The trial design is a randomized controlled study conducted at a single center, aiming to provide high-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions for this condition. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving arthroscopic assisted cancellous chips graft reconstruction, which is less invasive and may preserve wrist structures and blood supply, and the other undergoing a conventional open cancellous graft reconstruction using graft from the iliac crest with internal fixation by compression screw. Treatments are followed by repeated CT scans every two weeks from 6 to 16 weeks post-surgery to monitor bone healing. Patients are stratified by factors like smoking, fracture displacement, and involvement of the proximal pole. The study also includes long-term follow-up with online questionnaires up to 10 years after surgery. Participants will undergo clinical exams and imaging before surgery, with detailed assessments including CT scans to evaluate bone angulation and displacement, and MRI to assess blood supply when needed. Outcome measures include time to bone union, function and disability scores, pain levels, grip strength, and patient satisfaction. Follow-up visits occur at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery with additional online assessments at 5 and 10 years. Safety and complications are monitored throughout, and participants can withdraw at any time. This comprehensive monitoring aims to determine which surgical method offers better healing and function for patients with scaphoid delayed/non-union.
CONDITIONS
Arthroscopic vs. Open Bone Grafting for Scaphoid Delayed/Nonunion
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person) including clinical examination and CT scan of the wrist; MRI if proximal pole involved
Duration - 1 day
Participants undergo either arthroscopic assisted C chips graft reconstruction or open cancellous graft reconstruction with internal fixation for scaphoid delayed/non-union.
1 surgical visit
Duration - 6 to 16 weeks
Participants recover post-surgery while their bone healing is monitored regularly until union is established.
Repeated CT scans every 2 weeks during this period to assess bone healing; additional CT at 26 weeks if union is not achieved
Duration - Up to 120 months (10 years)
Participants have ongoing assessments of functional outcomes, pain, grip strength, and donor site morbidity to evaluate recovery and long-term effects.
Clinical and patient-reported outcome assessments at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24 months; questionnaires sent at 5 and 10 years
Total: 1 location
1
University Hospital Herlev/Gentofte, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinic for Shoulder-, Elbow- and Hand Surgery, Hellerup, Denmark
Hellerup, Denmark, 2900
Actively Recruiting
M
Morten Kjaer, MD
C
Camilla Stokkebro, Secretary
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
DOUBLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Peter Jørgsholm, Daniel Ossowski, Niels Thomsen...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32992390W P Cooney, J H Dobyns, R L Linscheid
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6999072Ronald L Linscheid, James H Dobyns, John W Beabout...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11792792Ruby Grewal, Nina Suh, Joy C MacDermid
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26649260C P Little, B J Burston, J Hopkinson-Woolley...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16488521F Schuind, F Moungondo, W El Kazzi
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27896458Ruby Grewal, Nina Suh, Joy C Macdermid
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23531510C Ramamurthy, L Cutler, D Nuttall...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17540748Geert A Buijze, Mathieu M E Wijffels, Thierry G Guitton...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22281168Cæcilie W Guldbrandsen, Dimitar I Radev, Robert Gvozdenovic
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33459143