Actively Recruiting
Blunt Fascial vs. Veress Needle Peritoneal Entry in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
Led by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Updated on 2024-05-09
100
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
49 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
This study aims to investigate the effect of two peritoneal entry techniques on intraoperative and post-operative outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon. Patients will be randomized to either blunt fascial or veress needle peritoneal entry. Insufflation times, failed entries, complications and post-operative pain scores will be collected. The investigators hypothesize that the blunt entry technique will be associated with shorter insufflation times and similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared with the veress needle entry technique. Primary Objective: To evaluate the insufflation times and success upon peritoneal entry according to peritoneal entry technique. Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the surgical outcomes and patients pain scores according to peritoneal entry technique.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Blunt Fascial vs. Veress Needle Peritoneal Entry in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Signed informed consent form provided
- Willingness to comply with all study procedures and available for the study duration
- At least 18 years of age
- Undergoing planned laparoscopic surgery with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
You will not qualify if you...
- Pregnancy
- Urgent or non-scheduled surgery
- Not eligible for umbilical entry
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
R
Raanan Meyer, MD
CONTACT
K
Kacey Hamilton
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here