Registry to Collect Safety and Effectiveness Data for Patients Using the C-Brace Microprocessor-Controlled Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis
Led by Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH · Updated on 2025-04-30
250
Participants Needed
76
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
This study aims to collect prospective safety and effectiveness data for the C-Brace System, a microprocessor-controlled knee ankle foot orthosis, following standard care practices. The research focuses on patients with lower extremity pareses who are fitted with the C-Brace device. The goal is to better understand how the C-Brace influences walking speed, balance, risk of falling, and confidence in balance over time.
The C-Brace is a custom-made device with thigh, calf, and foot components connected by an ankle joint or spring element. It uses sensors to continuously monitor knee joint movement and walking phases, adjusting hydraulic resistance and knee motion accordingly. Patients enrolled in the registry will undergo baseline evaluation, fitting, training or therapy sessions, and follow-up visits at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after fitting.
Participants will be assessed through various tests including timed walk tests, balance confidence scores, and mobility assessments at different intervals. The study also tracks falls related to device use and changes in activity levels with an activity tracker. Data collected will help characterize the safety and functional impact of the C-Brace over three years of follow-up.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
C-Brace Prospective Registry
Research Team
R
Russell L Lundstrom, MS
B
Barbara Pobatschnig, MSc
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match. Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Patient has been evaluated and successfully tested with the Trial Tool, and has been casted for a C-Brace.
Patient is able to communicate, provide feedback, understand and follow instructions during the course of the registry.
Patient is willing to provide informed consent.
You will not qualify if you...
Patient is geographically inaccessible to comply and participate in the registry.
Patient has not been casted for a C-Brace fitting.
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Implementation
Duration - Baseline and fitting period
Participants are fitted with the C-Brace device, which includes individually fabricated components and a sensor system to assist walking.
1 baseline visit (in-person) and fitting session
Post-implementation Follow-up
Duration - 36 months after definitive fitting
Participants receive training and therapy sessions to use the C-Brace and are followed according to standard care with evaluations at multiple time points.
Follow-up visits at 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months
How is the study designed?
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Masking
N/A
Allocation
N/A
Model
N/A
Primary Purpose
N/A
Number of Arms
0
Similar Trials
Comparing Bupivacaine-Lidocaine Combination Versus Bupivacaine Alone for Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block in Adults Having Elective Lower Leg Surgery
Registry to Collect Safety and Effectiveness Data for Patients Using the C-Brace Microprocessor-Controlled Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis
Comparing Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Combination to Fentanyl Alone with Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Above-Knee Amputation in Lower Limb Sarcoma Patients
Study Comparing Matrion Placental Membrane Treatment to Standard Care for Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Adults
Study Comparing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Traditional Dressings for Skin Grafts on the Lower Leg After Skin Tumour Removal
Photoacoustic Imaging to Assess Blood Vessels and Oxygen Levels in Feet of Adults With Lower Extremity Artery Disease or Healthy Volunteers
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Published Research Related To This Trial
The C-Brace® microprocessor controlled stance and swing orthosis improves safety, mobility, and quality of life at one year: Interim results from a prospective registry.
Russell L Lundstrom, Tyler D Klenow, Arri Morris...