Real-time individualization of the unified model of performance.
Jianbo Liu, Sridhar Ramakrishnan, Srinivas Laxminarayan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28436072/Actively Recruiting
Led by University of Arizona · Updated on 2025-11-04
180
Participants Needed
2
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
This research aims to compare a personalized caffeine dosing plan using the 2B-Alert Caffeine Optimization algorithm with the standard caffeine dosing recommendations during periods of total sleep deprivation. The study evaluates whether the personalized approach improves alertness, reduces sleepiness and cognitive decline, manages physical and emotional side effects better, and supports improved recovery sleep following sleep deprivation. Participants will first complete a 13-day at-home phase wearing an actigraph watch to track sleep and activity, and perform motor vigilance tests multiple times daily. Next, they will enter a 4-day in-lab phase including one night of baseline sleep, 62 hours of continuous sleep deprivation, and one night of recovery sleep. During sleep deprivation, participants will receive either caffeine gum or placebo gum under one of five randomized dosing conditions, ranging from placebo to standard and optimized caffeine doses administered on one or both nights. Throughout the study, participants will undergo regular psychomotor vigilance testing, sleep data collection through polysomnography during lab sleep nights, and mood and personality assessments. Researchers will measure reaction times during peak alertness windows, side effect profiles, cognitive function, and quality of recovery sleep. After completing the recovery sleep and all tests, participants will be released from the study, which spans approximately 17 days in total.
CONDITIONS
Caffeine Optimization Versus Standard Caffeine Dosage (2B-2)
W
William D Killgore, Ph.D.
L
Lindsey Hildebrand, MA
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
University of Arizona
Lead Sponsor
U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Optimized caffeine gum | Placebo gum | Standard caffeine gum | Typical over‑the‑counter caffeine (e.g., coffee) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Chewing caffeinated gum with optimized dose tailored per condition both nights | Chewing non‑caffeinated placebo gum during two nights of sleep deprivation | Chewing caffeinated gum at a standard fixed dose (100 mg per piece) both nights | Using typical over‑the‑counter caffeine such as coffee or energy drinks for daytime alertness during sleep loss |
| Role in study | Investigational arm testing tailored dosing strategy | Inactive control to measure placebo effects | Standard fixed‑dose comparator based on current dosing practice | Represents usual real‑world caffeine use outside the trial |
| Primary use | Evaluate whether adaptive caffeine dosing improves alertness more effectively | Control for comparison without active stimulant effect | Provide a fixed, commonly used caffeine dose during sleep deprivation | Used by many individuals for temporary alertness during sleep deprivation |
| How it is given or performed | Participants chew gum with doses tailored per sleep deprivation schedule both nights | Participants chew non‑caffeinated gum both nights | Participants chew gum containing standard caffeine dose both nights | Consumed as beverages like coffee or energy drinks according to individual habits |
| Evidence status | Hypothesized to deliver greater or more efficient alertness benefit via tailored dosing | Used as control; no performance benefit expected | Expected to improve alertness based on known effects of fixed caffeine dosing | Common caffeine use improves alertness but may vary by dose and timing |
| Important risks | Risk profile similar to standard caffeine but dosing adjusted to reduce excess intake | No caffeine‑related side effects | Potential jitteriness or sleep disruption from caffeine | Possible sleep disturbance or jitteriness depending on dose and timing |
| Important limitations | Adaptive dosing needs validation for feasibility and effectiveness in real‑world use | Provides no active alertness aid; cannot inform dose–response | Fixed dose may not suit individual sleep‑loss profiles | Real‑world caffeine use lacks precise timing and dose control and may not align with optimal alertness windows |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 13 days
Participants complete baseline personality and mood testing, then wear an actigraph watch and use the 2B-Alert app to collect sleep and psychomotor vigilance data at home.
1 enrollment visit and daily data collection at home
Duration - 4 days
Participants spend 4 days in the lab including a night of baseline sleep monitored by polysomnography followed by 62 hours of continuous sleep deprivation during which psychomotor vigilance tests are performed periodically. During this period, participants receive caffeine or placebo gum according to their assigned condition.
Continuous in-lab stay with multiple assessments and caffeine/placebo administration
Duration - 1 day
Participants complete a night of recovery sleep monitored by polysomnography followed by additional psychomotor vigilance testing before being released from the lab.
1 in-lab recovery sleep night and follow-up testing visit
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
DOUBLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
FACTORIAL
Primary Purpose
OTHER
Number of Arms
5
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Jianbo Liu, Sridhar Ramakrishnan, Srinivas Laxminarayan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28436072/Gary H Kamimori, Dagny Johnson, David Thorne...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16313140/Sridhar Ramakrishnan, Nancy J Wesensten, Gary H Kamimori...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27397562/Sridhar Ramakrishnan, Nancy J Wesensten, Thomas J Balkin...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26518594/William D S Killgore, Ellen T Kahn-Greene, Nancy L Grugle...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19238808/Francisco G Vital-Lopez, Sridhar Ramakrishnan, Tracy J Doty...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29808510/William D S Killgore, Gary H Kamimori
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33364521/Jaques Reifman, Kamal Kumar, Nancy J Wesensten...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27634801/University of Arizona
Lead Sponsor
U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity
Collaborating Sponsor