New Therapies for Highly Sensitized Patients on the Waiting List.
Ashley Vo, Noriko Ammerman, Stanley C Jordan
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38995690/Actively Recruiting
Led by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Updated on 2026-05-22
20
Participants Needed
3
Research Sites
730 weeks
Total Duration
This research focuses on adults aged 18 to 65 who have been waiting at least one year for a kidney transplant and have a very high calculated panel reactive antibody cPRA level of 99.5% or higher. These patients have immune systems that would reject most available kidneys. The study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using a new immunotherapy involving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells CAR T Cells combined with chemotherapy to reduce cPRA levels and improve transplant chances. Participants undergo a process starting with leukapheresis to collect T cells, followed by lymphodepleting chemotherapy and infusion of two types of CAR T cells called CART-BCMA and huCART-19. The study includes a safety run-in phase and three treatment cohorts to assess the best tolerated doses. Different drug doses and CAR T cell amounts are given depending on the cohort, with chemotherapy drugs cyclophosphamide and fludarabine used in specific phases. During the main study, which lasts up to two years, participants will attend up to 30 clinic or hospital visits over one year, plus additional visits if a transplant occurs. Researchers will monitor safety by tracking adverse events for 12 months after infusion and measuring changes in cPRA levels for up to one year. Long-term follow-up is planned for 15 years after CAR T cell therapy. Outcomes include the timing, frequency, and severity of side effects, as well as transplant rejection episodes and infections in participants who receive a kidney transplant.
CONDITIONS
CAR-T Cell Therapy for Desensitization in Kidney Transplantation
M
Mary Kaminski, PA
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania Clinical Cell and Vaccine Production Facility (CVPF)
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | CAR‑T cell desensitization (trial) | Conventional desensitization (IVIG/plasmapheresis/rituximab) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A one‑arm sequential dose‑escalation study evaluating lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by CART‑BCMA and huCART‑19 CAR‑T cell infusions for desensitization | Conventional desensitization involves methods like intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis and anti‑CD20 antibodies such as rituximab |
| Role in trial | Investigational regimen being administered in sequential cohorts following lymphodepletion | Not trial‑assigned; acts as external clinical context for comparison |
| Primary use | To reduce calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) levels to facilitate transplantation in highly sensitized patients | To lower donor‑specific antibody levels to enable transplantation in sensitized candidates |
| How it is given or performed | Participants undergo leukapheresis, lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide ± fludarabine), then receive infusions of CART‑BCMA and huCART‑19 CAR‑T cells in sequential dose cohorts | Typically administered via plasmapheresis sessions often combined with IVIG infusions and sometimes anti‑CD20 antibody such as rituximab |
| Evidence status | No published results yet; safety and efficacy in reducing cPRA are under investigation | Supported by multiple reviews and clinical reports demonstrating ability to reduce antibodies and enable transplantation |
| Important risks | Potential risks include cytokine release syndrome, prolonged immunosuppression, infusion‑related toxicities; safety under evaluation | Risks include infection, bleeding, or immunologic rebound following plasmapheresis and immunotherapy |
| Important limitations | Single‑group early phase design without control arm; long‑term transplantation outcomes and durability not yet known | Variable response rates, antibody rebound, and logistical challenges limit effectiveness in extremely sensitized patients |
| Patient impact | Not yet measurable; outcomes such as successful transplant access are under study | Enables some highly sensitized patients to receive transplants and avoid prolonged time on dialysis |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Up to several weeks until completion of safety run-in treatment
Participants undergo leukapheresis to collect T cells for CAR T cell manufacturing, followed by lymphodepleting chemotherapy and infusion of CAR T cells as part of a safety run-in phase.
Several visits including leukapheresis, chemotherapy administration, and cell infusion
Duration - Several days for chemotherapy and cell infusions
Participants receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by infusion of CART-BCMA and huCART-19 CAR T cells according to their assigned cohort.
Multiple visits for chemotherapy and CAR T cell infusions
Duration - Up to 12 months
Participants are monitored for safety, efficacy, and adverse events for up to 12 months after CAR T cell infusion.
Regular follow-up visits over 12 months
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NA
Model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
1
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Ashley Vo, Noriko Ammerman, Stanley C Jordan
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38995690/Vijay G Bhoj, Mary Kaminski, Huiwu Zhao...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42235014/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania Clinical Cell and Vaccine Production Facility (CVPF)
Collaborating Sponsor