Concurrent cognitive control training augments the antidepressant efficacy of tDCS: a pilot study.
R A Segrave, S Arnold, K Hoy...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24486425/Actively Recruiting
Led by Columbia University · Updated on 2026-07-28
240
Participants Needed
4
Research Sites
26 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are studying mild cognitive impairment MCI, a condition that increases the risk of dementia, to find effective treatments that improve cognition and daily function. This study compares high dose crossword puzzle training, low dose crossword puzzle training, and a health education control in adults aged 55 to 89. The trial builds on previous findings that crossword puzzles may help reduce brain atrophy and improve cognitive outcomes compared to computerized training. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups high dose crosswords four puzzles per week, low dose crosswords one puzzle per week, or health education. The initial intensive phase lasts 12 weeks, followed by booster sessions occurring at weeks 20, 32, 42, 52, 64, and 78. Crossword puzzle sessions are completed both at home and in the clinic, while the health education group receives reading materials and phone calls to match time spent on crosswords. Throughout the study, participants attend in-person assessments at weeks 0, 12, 32, 52, and 78, which include cognitive testing and brain imaging. Researchers will measure changes in Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale scores, functional activities, MRI hippocampal volume, and cortical thickness. Biomarkers related to neurodegeneration and Alzheimers pathology will also be evaluated. The total study duration extends up to 78 weeks with careful monitoring of cognitive and brain health.
CONDITIONS
Cognitive Training and Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment: COGIT-2 Trial
L
Lola Nedic, BA
D
Davangere P Devanand, MD, MBBS
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Columbia University
Lead Sponsor
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Crossword Puzzle Cognitive Training (4 sessions/week) | Crossword Puzzle Cognitive Training (1 session/week) | Health Education (Lifestyle and Illness Book Chapters) | Computerized Skills-Focused Cognitive Training |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What is it? | Intensive crossword puzzle cognitive training, performed four times per week over 12 weeks, with repeated booster sessions up to 78 weeks. | Less intensive crossword puzzle cognitive training, performed once weekly over 12 weeks, with similar booster sessions as high dose. | Health education control, consisting of reading and reviewing book chapters about illnesses and lifestyle topics, matched in assessment schedule to active arms. | Computerized cognitive training designed to enhance specific skills such as memory, attention, and executive functioning, typically delivered on digital platforms for older adults with cognitive complaints. |
| Primary use | Study investigates whether intensive crossword puzzle training can improve cognitive function and daily activities in MCI participants. | Assesses whether less frequent crossword puzzle training is beneficial for cognitive health and everyday functioning in people with MCI. | Serves as comparison group to test if cognitive changes are specific to crossword puzzle training, controlling for engagement and participant attention. | Employed clinically to promote cognitive improvement and preserve independence in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. |
| Evidence status | Peer-reviewed publication from the COGIT-2 trial reports statistically significant cognitive and functional gains for high dose crossword training over health education, with effects sustained up to 78 weeks. | COGIT-2 trial results indicate cognitive and functional improvement for low dose crossword training, though magnitude and durability are less than for high dose. | Used as control; registry and publication show modest, non-specific cognitive and functional change, not sustained to the same degree as active interventions. | Multiple studies document cognitive improvement in older adults with and without MCI using computerized training, including sustained benefits for attention, memory, and executive skills. |
| Important limitations | Requires frequent participation and ongoing access to a computer; cognitive and functional results may not generalize to wider MCI populations outside the trial setting. | Lower training frequency may reduce effect size; requires computer access and similar eligibility, limiting applicability to less tech-savvy older adults. | Does not specifically target cognitive skills; engagement may vary based on reading interest, and functional impact is typically modest. | Benefits depend on participant engagement and platform usability; digital literacy, adherence, and variations in cognitive training design may affect individual outcomes. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 12 weeks
Participants complete 12 weeks of crossword puzzles at either high (4 puzzles/week) or low dose (1 puzzle/week), or receive health education readings and sessions.
In-person sessions and assessments at weeks 0 and 12
Duration - Weeks 13 to 78
Participants complete booster crossword sessions or health education phone calls at scheduled weeks, with in-person assessments at weeks 32, 52, and 78.
In-person visits at weeks 32, 52, and 78; phone calls at weeks 20, 42, and 64
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
TRIPLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
3
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
R A Segrave, S Arnold, K Hoy...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24486425/Laura A Wang, Terry E Goldberg, Philip D Harvey...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40852373/Philip D Harvey, Matthew Zayas-Bazan, Lize Tibiriçá...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34924275/Michael J Valenzuela, Perminder Sachdev
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16207391/Jeffrey N Motter, Gregory H Pelton, Kristina D'Antonio...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30035339/Julie Zissimopoulos, Eileen Crimmins, Patricia St Clair
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27134606/Matthew C Lohman, George W Rebok, Adam P Spira...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23006426/Max Owens, Ernst H W Koster, Nazanin Derakshan
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23350956/Fredric D Wolinsky, Michael P Jones, Megan M Dotson
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32964141/Luca Rozzini, Daniela Costardi, Barbara Vicini Chilovi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17117398/Columbia University
Lead Sponsor
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Collaborating Sponsor