Comparing Modified and Classic Nuss Techniques for Surgical Correction of Pectus Excavatum in Patients Aged 11 to 18

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating and comparing two surgical methods, the classic and modified Nuss techniques, used to correct pectus excavatum in patients aged 11 to 18 years. This study aims to fill the gap in comparative data between these minimally invasive procedures by assessing outcomes like operative time, postoperative pain control, intensive care unit stay length, and cosmetic results. The goal is to improve surgical management and potentially influence future treatment standards for this chest wall deformity. The study focuses on patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2024 using either the classic or modified Nuss technique. It is a retrospective analysis conducted at a single center, examining past surgical cases to gather data on various operative and recovery outcomes. The research does not involve new treatments but observes and compares existing surgical approaches. Participants medical records will be reviewed to collect data on operating times and other clinical outcomes. The primary measurement is the duration of the surgery in minutes. Additional factors such as pain management, cosmetic appearance, and intensive care stay will also be assessed. The study is observational, relying on past data, and does not require active intervention, with the total study period spanning the retrospective timeframe of surgeries performed from 2010 to 2024.

Comparative Analysis Of Modified Vs. Classical Nuss Technique In The Surgical Correction Of Pectus Excavatum "