Comparing CT-Guided and Fluoroscopic-Guided Genicular Nerve Ablation to Treat Knee Osteoarthritis in Adults

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are studying adults aged 45 to 80 with knee osteoarthritis that has not improved with standard treatments. The study compares two methods of genicular nerve ablation, guided by CT imaging or fluoroscopy, to see which better reduces knee pain and improves function. The trial also looks at safety and patient satisfaction with each technique. Participants receive either CT-guided or fluoroscopic-guided genicular nerve ablation. The CT-guided method uses detailed CT scans to precisely place needles near the nerves causing pain, while the fluoroscopic method uses real-time X-ray images to guide needle placement. Both procedures aim to disrupt pain signals from the knee nerves. The study standardizes treatment settings and carefully monitors all participants. Participants will have follow-up visits at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the procedure. During these visits, researchers will assess pain levels using the visual analog scale, evaluate knee function with a specialized arthritis score, and record any side effects or issues. Patient satisfaction is also measured through questionnaires. The main focus is on pain reduction at 3 months, with ongoing monitoring through 6 months.

Comparative Study of CT and Fluoroscopic Guided Genicular Nerve Ablation in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis