Randomized Trial Comparing Basilic and Cephalic Vein Methods for Midline Catheter Placement in Children Ages 2 to 17

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating two different vein approaches, the basilic vein and the cephalic vein, for placing midline catheters in children aged 2 to 17 years who need this device during general anesthesia. This randomized controlled trial aims to find out which vein approach leads to better blood sampling success during the catheters use. The study also looks at other factors like ease of catheter placement, number of needle attempts, vein size, catheter duration, complications, and patient satisfaction. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive midline catheter placement either through the basilic vein or the cephalic vein using ultrasound guidance. The catheter will remain in place for up to 7 days after surgery, during which several outcomes will be measured. The trial includes two groups with equal numbers of children receiving each vein approach to compare the results. During the study, doctors will assess blood sampling success by checking if at least 2 mL of blood can be drawn through the catheter at least once without needing extra needle sticks. They will also evaluate difficulty of insertion, number of punctures, vein measurements, catheter time in place, any complications, and how satisfied patients are. These evaluations will take place from the time of catheter insertion until removal, with some measurements taken up to the first day after surgery. The total participation spans from catheter insertion through up to 7 days postoperatively.

Comparing Basilic and Cephalic Vein Approaches for Midline Catheter Placement in Children