ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis.
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, James L Buxbaum, Syed M Abbas Fehmi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30979521/Actively Recruiting
Led by Rush University Medical Center · Updated on 2026-02-18
40
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
This research aims to evaluate the use of a low-power holmium laser to treat large andor difficult stones in the bile duct or pancreatic duct in adults. It also seeks to assess the safety of this low-wattage holmium laser and compare its performance to electrohydraulic lithotripsy for managing these challenging stones. The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to answer these important questions. Participants will undergo an ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure where their bile duct or pancreatic duct stones will be broken up using either the low-power holmium laser lithotripsy device or the electrohydraulic lithotripsy device. The study includes two groups one receiving laser lithotripsy and the other receiving electrohydraulic lithotripsy. The procedures use single-operator cholangioscopy to guide the treatment. After the procedure, stone clearance and other safety measures will be assessed. Participants will be monitored during and after the procedure for any adverse events or complications. Approximately 30 days post-procedure, researchers will contact participants to document symptoms or side effects and assess symptom resolution. The main outcome measured is complete stone clearance immediately after the procedure, along with other secondary outcomes such as procedure time, number of procedures, and hospital stay length. This follow-up aims to ensure safety and evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments over time.
CONDITIONS
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Versus Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Difficult Choledocholithiasis and Pancreatic Duct Stones
N
Neal A Mehta, MD
A
Amanda Lin, DSc, CCRC
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Rush University Medical Center
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Low‑wattage holmium laser lithotripsy | Electrohydraulic lithotripsy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An investigational method using low‑wattage holmium:YAG laser delivered via ERCP to fragment difficult bile or pancreatic duct stones. | An active comparator using electrohydraulic lithotripsy during ERCP to fragment difficult bile or pancreatic duct stones. |
| Role in trial | Investigational intervention arm being evaluated for efficacy and safety. | Active comparator arm serving as current investigational alternative. |
| Primary use | Fragmentation of large or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones during ERCP. | Fragmentation of large or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones during ERCP. |
| How it is performed | Delivered via ERCP using a low‑wattage holmium:YAG laser device for stone fragmentation. | Performed during ERCP using an electrohydraulic probe to break stones. |
| Evidence status | Effectiveness under investigation; comparative performance versus electrohydraulic lithotripsy is being evaluated. | Established rescue method for difficult duct stones; used in current clinical practice under direct visualization. |
| Important risks | Safety profile not yet established; risks are monitored in the trial. | Acceptable safety in current practice, though overall safety data are limited and require clinical governance. |
| Important limitations | Efficacy and safety compared with electrohydraulic lithotripsy not yet established. | Variable clearance rates; some studies report slightly lower median clearance compared to laser; procedural complexity and governance considerations restrict widespread use. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - Single procedure visit
Participants undergo an ERCP procedure where they receive either low-wattage holmium laser lithotripsy or electrohydraulic lithotripsy to break down large or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones.
1 procedure visit (in-person)
Duration - About 30 days
Participants are monitored for adverse events and symptom resolution approximately 30 days after the procedure via phone call.
1 follow-up phone call
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, James L Buxbaum, Syed M Abbas Fehmi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30979521/Rush University Medical Center
Lead Sponsor