Actively Recruiting
Comparison Between Propess and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming
Led by The University of Hong Kong · Updated on 2024-07-24
28
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
78 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
The investigators aimed to compare efficacy and safety of Propess versus Cooks double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening with an unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Comparison Between Propess and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Viable singleton pregnancy
- Cephalic presentation
- Bishop score less than 7
- At term (37+0 weeks of gestation or more)
- Nulliparous women
You will not qualify if you...
- Gestation less than 37 weeks
- Multiple pregnancy
- Bishop score less than 7
- Malpresentation
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
- Previous Caesarean section
- History of myomectomy
- Maternal fever
- Suspected infection
- Abnormal fetal heart-rate patterns
- Rupture of membranes
- Intrauterine growth restriction
- Not fit for giving consent
- Allergic to Propess or PGE2
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
Y
Yin Fong Leung, MBBS
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here