Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 18Years +
All Genders
ID07127380

MID-MIS Trial Protocol Comparing Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF for Discogenic Low Back Pain

Led by Copernicus Memorial Hospital · Updated on 2026-04-15

100

Participants Needed

1

Research Sites

1 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a major cause of lower back pain and disability, with its occurrence increasing as people age. This trial is designed to compare two minimally invasive surgical methods, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF), in treating patients with discogenic low back pain unresponsive to conservative treatments. The study aims to provide clearer evidence on which technique may offer better outcomes, fewer complications, and cost advantages. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either MIS-TLIF or MIDLIF surgery. MIS-TLIF involves a percutaneous approach for screw placement and a lateral approach for decompression, while MIDLIF uses a medial approach with muscle retraction and medialized screw placement. Each participant will be followed for 12 months post-surgery, with evaluations at multiple time points to assess pain, disability, quality of life, complications, and treatment costs. During the study, participants will undergo assessments including pain scales (VAS and NRS), disability questionnaires (COMI, ODI), and quality of life measures (EQ-5D-5L) before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes like complication rates, hospital stay length, procedure duration, blood loss, and imaging for spinal changes will be monitored. The study will also track recovery time and adjacent segment disease through radiological exams. Data will be analyzed to determine differences between the two surgical methods over the year-long follow-up.

CONDITIONS

Brief Title

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Complications Rate and Treatment Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years +
All Genders

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Discogenic lower lumbar-sacral pain lasting longer than one year
  • Failure of conservative treatment including rehabilitation and pain management
  • Lumbar discopathy qualified for interbody fusion and pedicle screw stabilization
  • Informed consent provided for study participation and treatment
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Contraindications to surgery under general anesthesia
  • Age under 18 years
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Lack of informed consent to participate
  • Lumbar-sac discopathy requiring surgical treatment at more than two levels
  • Spinal deformities such as adult idiopathic scoliosis, degenerative scoliosis, spinal malignancy, inflammatory spinal disease, post-traumatic deformity, or congenital anomalies
  • Lower lumbar-sacral pain due to causes other than degenerative spine disease
  • Spinal oncology disease
  • True and degenerative spondylolisthesis
  • Contraindications to MRI of the lumbar-sacral spine

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Your Study Journey

Screening

Duration - 2 to 4 weeks

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.

1 visit (in-person)

Surgery and Immediate Post-operative Care

Duration - Up to 2 days

Participants undergo either Mini-TLIF or MIDLIF surgery to treat discogenic low back pain, followed by immediate post-operative care.

Hospitalization with approximately 2 days until discharge

Post-operative Follow-up

Duration - Up to 12 months

Participants are monitored through follow-up visits to assess recovery, complications, and treatment outcomes including pain, disability, and quality of life.

Multiple visits at 2 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery

Trial Site Locations

Total: 1 location

1

Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Łódź, Poland

Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Poland, 93-513

Actively Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

A

Aleksander Kowal, MD

K

Kamil Krystkiewicz, MD, PhD

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

SINGLE

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

TREATMENT

Number of Arms

2

Similar Trials

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of CONDUIT174; ALIF Cage...

Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Actively Recruiting

1 location

Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Opioid-Free Versus Opi...

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Actively Recruiting

1 location

Multimodal Physiological Reserve Optimizing Prehabilitation ...

Spine Degeneration

Actively Recruiting

4 locations

Frequently Asked Questions

Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here

Published Research Related To This Trial

Minimally invasive fusion surgery for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study between MIDLIF and TLIF.

Pedro Santos Silva, Ana Jardim, Joana Pereira...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37422769

Examination of clinical and radiographic outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of TLIF, MidLIF, and MIS-TLIF procedures.

Nicholas P Tippins, Anne M Foreit, Nathan J Kussow...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40315609

Minimally-Invasive midline posterior interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws compares favorably to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion.

Charles H Crawford, Roger K Owens, Mladen Djurasovic...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31535047

Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.

S L Parker, O Adogwa, T F Witham...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21506066

Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.

Lei Xie, Wen-Jian Wu, Yu Liang

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27503024

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single segmental lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.

Jing Xue, Yueming Song, Hao Liu...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34602458

Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Johan L Heemskerk, Oluwaseun Oluwadara Akinduro, William Clifton...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34273567

Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease.

Xuelei Zhang, Yu Zhang, Zuchao Gu...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39333680

Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis.

Yang-Yi Wang, Yu-Hsuan Chung, Chun-Hsien Huang...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38725087