MID-MIS Trial Protocol Comparing Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF for Discogenic Low Back Pain
Led by Copernicus Memorial Hospital · Updated on 2026-04-15
100
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
1 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
Brief Title
Who Can Participate
AI-Screening
Your Study Journey
Trial Site Locations
Research Team
How is the study designed?
Similar Trials
Frequently Asked Questions
Research Publications
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a major cause of lower back pain and disability, with its occurrence increasing as people age. This trial is designed to compare two minimally invasive surgical methods, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF), in treating patients with discogenic low back pain unresponsive to conservative treatments. The study aims to provide clearer evidence on which technique may offer better outcomes, fewer complications, and cost advantages.
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either MIS-TLIF or MIDLIF surgery. MIS-TLIF involves a percutaneous approach for screw placement and a lateral approach for decompression, while MIDLIF uses a medial approach with muscle retraction and medialized screw placement. Each participant will be followed for 12 months post-surgery, with evaluations at multiple time points to assess pain, disability, quality of life, complications, and treatment costs.
During the study, participants will undergo assessments including pain scales (VAS and NRS), disability questionnaires (COMI, ODI), and quality of life measures (EQ-5D-5L) before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes like complication rates, hospital stay length, procedure duration, blood loss, and imaging for spinal changes will be monitored. The study will also track recovery time and adjacent segment disease through radiological exams. Data will be analyzed to determine differences between the two surgical methods over the year-long follow-up.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Complications Rate and Treatment Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain
Who Can Participate
Age: 18Years +
All Genders
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
Discogenic lower lumbar-sacral pain lasting longer than one year
Failure of conservative treatment including rehabilitation and pain management
Lumbar discopathy qualified for interbody fusion and pedicle screw stabilization
Informed consent provided for study participation and treatment
You will not qualify if you...
Contraindications to surgery under general anesthesia
Age under 18 years
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Lack of informed consent to participate
Lumbar-sac discopathy requiring surgical treatment at more than two levels
Spinal deformities such as adult idiopathic scoliosis, degenerative scoliosis, spinal malignancy, inflammatory spinal disease, post-traumatic deformity, or congenital anomalies
Lower lumbar-sacral pain due to causes other than degenerative spine disease
Spinal oncology disease
True and degenerative spondylolisthesis
Contraindications to MRI of the lumbar-sacral spine
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
1
2
3
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Surgery and Immediate Post-operative Care
Duration - Up to 2 days
Participants undergo either Mini-TLIF or MIDLIF surgery to treat discogenic low back pain, followed by immediate post-operative care.
Hospitalization with approximately 2 days until discharge
Post-operative Follow-up
Duration - Up to 12 months
Participants are monitored through follow-up visits to assess recovery, complications, and treatment outcomes including pain, disability, and quality of life.
Multiple visits at 2 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery
Minimally invasive fusion surgery for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study between MIDLIF and TLIF.
Minimally-Invasive midline posterior interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws compares favorably to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion.
Charles H Crawford, Roger K Owens, Mladen Djurasovic...
Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.
Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.
Johan L Heemskerk, Oluwaseun Oluwadara Akinduro, William Clifton...
Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease.