Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 18Years +
All Genders
Healthy Volunteers
ID06821516

Comparison of Analgesic Effectiveness Between Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With Spinal Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Led by Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital · Updated on 2026-05-07

52

Participants Needed

1

Research Sites

13 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the pain relief effectiveness of two nerve block techniques, the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block and the Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESP), in adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia. The study aims to determine which nerve block provides better postoperative pain control based on pain scores, opioid use, and patient satisfaction. This research addresses the significant pain and movement limitations patients face after hip replacement surgery and seeks to improve recovery and reduce complications. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the PENG block or the L-ESP block before surgery. Both groups will have spinal anesthesia during the operation. Following surgery, all patients will use patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to manage opioid intake, and pain levels will be recorded at multiple time points up to 24 hours after the nerve block. Additional rescue pain medication will be given if needed. Various parameters such as hemodynamic stability, opioid consumption, pain scores, patient satisfaction, and hospital stay length will be compared between the two groups. Throughout the 24-hour postoperative period, participants will be closely monitored for pain intensity using the Numeric Rating Scale at scheduled intervals from baseline up to 24 hours after surgery. Researchers will also track opioid use, time to first pain sensation, rescue medication use, vital signs, nausea, vomiting, and any complications related to the nerve blocks. Patient satisfaction will be assessed via questionnaire, and overall recovery measures including early mobilization and length of hospital stay will be documented to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of each nerve block technique.

CONDITIONS

Brief Title

Comparison of Pain Relief Methods for Hip Surgery: A Study on Two Different Nerve Block Techniques

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years +
All Genders
Healthy Volunteers

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Voluntary willingness to participate in the study.
  • Patients who will undergo Total Hip Arthroplasty surgery.
  • Patients aged over 18 years.
  • ASA score I-II-III.
  • Patients who are fully oriented and can cooperate.
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • ASA score IV-V.
  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study.
  • Patients under 18 years of age.
  • Presence of active infection in the area to be operated on.
  • Chronic pain and continuous analgesic use.
  • Patients with coagulation disorders.
  • Patients who cannot cooperate with postoperative pain follow-up.
  • Patients with allergies to local anesthetic agents.
  • Presence of neuropathy or myopathy in the operated extremity.

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Your Study Journey

Screening

Duration - 2 to 4 weeks

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.

1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Duration - Day of surgery and first 24 hours postoperatively

Participants receive either a Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block or a Lumbar Erector Spina Plane block before undergoing total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Pain levels and opioid consumption are monitored closely during and after surgery.

1 preoperative visit and multiple assessments during the first 24 hours after surgery

Trial Site Locations

Total: 1 location

1

Basaksehir Çam Ve Sakura City Hospital

Istanbul, Türki̇ye, Turkey (Türkiye)

Actively Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

M

MUZAFFER GENCER

A

AZİZ BERKAY SÜNE

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

DOUBLE

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

PREVENTION

Number of Arms

2

Similar Trials

Comparison of Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine Added to ...

Pain, Postoperative

Actively Recruiting

1 location

A Phase II/III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ...

Postoperative Analgesia

Actively Recruiting

2 locations

Frequently Asked Questions

Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here

Published Research Related To This Trial

Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, observer-masked, controlled trial.

G Pascarella, F Costa, R Del Buono...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34196965

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty Comparing 24-Hour Opioid Requirements: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Dahlia Townsend, Nasir Siddique, Atsumi Kimura...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36225251

The Analgesic Effects of Preemptive Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block in Comparison with Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Marwa Mohamed Medhat, Alshaimaa Abdel Fattah Kamel, Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek Salem...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38028113

Combination of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane (S-ESP) Blocks for Hip Fracture Pain and Surgery: A Case Series.

Francesco Marrone, Pierfrancesco Fusco, Serkan Tulgar...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38332999

Use and Clinical Relevancy of Pericapsular Nerve Block (PENG) in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Poonam Pai, Daniel Amor, Yan H Lai...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38268183