Actively Recruiting
Comparison of Stress Response Evoked by Conventional Versus Videolaryngoscope
Led by Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation · Updated on 2026-04-03
124
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
26 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Impact of using video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy technique in terms of improved hemodynamics post intubation and time taken for intubation.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Comparison of Stress Response Evoked by Conventional Versus Videolaryngoscope
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- ASA physical status I or II
- Age between 18 and 60 years
- Preoperatively nonhypertensive and hemodynamically stable
- Scheduled for elective surgeries excluding airway surgeries
- Provided informed consent
- Mallampati score I or II
- Interincisor gap greater than 3 centimeters
- Body mass index less than 30 kg/m82
You will not qualify if you...
- Refusal to participate
- ASA physical status III, IV, or V
- Hemodynamically unstable patients
- Patients with hypertension or ischemic heart disease, controlled or uncontrolled
- Airway abnormalities including congenital malformations and maxillofacial abnormalities
- History of head, neck, or airway trauma or surgery
- Undergoing emergency procedures
- Pregnancy
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 74200
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
S
Syed M Abbas, FCPS
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here