Esophagitis

Roux-en-y gastric bypass is performed with the patient in the French position by a bariatric surgeon with 8 years of experience. A single port was placed in the umbilicus, an additional trocar (5mm) was placed in the right side of the abdomen. The surgery is started by performing the liver retraction with the grasper plus magnet attached to the border for the correct visualization of the surgical field. Later, the division of the major curvature of the omentum is started, and as it is performed in a superior direction, the magnet is positioned to retract the fundus and finishing exposing the esophageal hiatus where a hiatal hernia is visualized, which is decided to be repaired transoperatively. For the hiatoplasty, after placing a reference around the stomach, the magnet is positioned in that reference to retract the stomach and esophagus and to be able to suture the hernia defect. Then we proceed to perform the RYGB with the simplified technique, starting with the reference attached to the magnet but this time at the opposite end to start the resection of the lesser omentum, a minor step prior to the confection of the pouch. The pouch confection is done with 3 blue cartridges. Continuing with the procedure, the retraction of the transverse colon is performed with the use of the magnet to visualize the treitz angle and start the 60 cm measurement of the biliopancreatic limb. Later, gastrojejunal anastomosis is performed traditionally. Once this step is finished, the 100 cm alimentary limb is measured and then, the magnet-assisted jejunal anastomosis is performed. The Petersen defect and the intermesenteric defect is closed assisted by magnets. A methylene blue leak test is routinely performed, with negative results, this time testing both anastomoses. Finally, the magnet-assisted omega section is made with the retraction of the limb to finish the Roux-en-Y.

The project goal is the development and early stage validation of a wearable sensor for dysphagia in patients with PD. The first phase of the program involves engineering goals relating to increasing the battery life of this sensor to 48 hours between charges and reducing the overall form factor size. The second phase of the program is to conduct focus groups with PD patients to assess sensor usability, set up burden, and design feedback. The third phase of the study will assess the feasibility of the sensor to detect and cue swallowing in a small cohort of PD patients.

The study duration for each participant is planned to be 2 years. Total study duration is approximately 4 years.

The investigators conduct this phase II study to evaluate safety and effectiveness of EGCG in patients with dysphagia. Swallowing-related dysphagia and pain scores were recorded using the numerical rating scale (NRS) daily . Barium meal radiography was utilized to measure the luminal size and the length of the lesion area both before and after a week of EGCG treatment. The scales are translated into Chinese and guides in Chinese are developed instructing how to use the scales and perform the assessments.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate if Danning Tablets are effective in alleviating dyspepsia in patients with any of the following digestive symptoms: upper abdominal pain, bloating, loss of appetite, acid reflux or constipation. The main questions it aims to answer are: How effective are Danning Tablets for patients with indigestion symptoms? What are the impact factors (e.g. severity of conditions, demographic features, dose and length of treatment etc.) of the efficacy of Danning Tablets for indigestion patients? Participants already taking Danning Tablets as part of their regular medical care for indigestion will take questionnaires by the end of two weeks and four weeks respectively from the start of their treatment.

The purpose of this post-market clinical follow up study is to assess the efficacy on clinical symptoms of LARS of low volume Transanal Irrigation by MiniGo in conjunction with conservative treatment versus conservative treatment at 3 months.

Study Design: * This is a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Randomization and Blinding * Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive Vonaprazan 10 mg, Vonaprazan 20 mg, or Esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for 8 weeks. * Randomization will be stratified by baseline severity of esophagitis (LA grade B vs. C/D). * The study will be open-label, but the outcome assessors will be blinded. Study Arms 1. Vonaprazan 10 mg once daily 2. Vonaprazan 20 mg once daily 3. Esomeprazole 40 mg once daily Duration: * 8 weeks of treatment, followed by endoscopic assessment and symptom evaluation. I Study Procedures: Baseline : * Perform upper GI endoscopy to confirm LA grade B or higher esophagitis. * Record baseline GERD-Q score. * Randomize participants into one of the three treatment groups. * Dispense study medication. Follow-up (Week 4 - Interim Assessment) * Assess GERD-Q score. * Monitor adherence and adverse events. End-of-Treatment (Week 8 - Primary Outcome Assessment) * Repeat upper GI endoscopy to assess mucosal healing. * Reassess GERD-Q score. * Collect adverse event data. * Conclude study participation.

The FARE Patient Registry will serve as a prospective, observational food allergy reporting system that stores detailed health and other basic information about patients' real-world experiences with food allergies, to encourage open sharing of de-identified data and participation in clinical trials. The FARE Patient Registry intends to make and support scientific discoveries by enabling the food allergy community to participate directly in research.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (QD) compared to placebo QD in the number of participants with a peak eosinophilic histologic response \<15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf) after 12 weeks of therapy.

The main objective of the study is to compare the maternal, fetal, and infant outcomes of pregnant women who are exposed to vonoprazan during pregnancy with outcomes of an internal comparison cohort of pregnant women who are unexposed to vonoprazan during pregnancy but who may be exposed to other products for the treatment of conditions for which vonoprazan may be prescribed.