Fibromyalgia

This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate potential effects (positive and negative) of a 3-day course with follow-up for 100 adults with CFS/ME. The 3-day course used in this trial is named the Lightning Process (LP). The course is built on the LP manual (Parker, 2013) and includes stress theory, Positive Psychology and knowledge about regulating thoughts, feelings and behavior, and through that positively influencing physiology. Positive and negative effects of the course on symptoms, disability and quality of life will be investigated, and a long-term follow-up of work participation conducted. Any adverse events experienced during or after the 3-day course will be handled according to protocol.

To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ONO-1110 in Patients with Fibromyalgia

Multi-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized and parallel controlled trials are used to evaluate the role and impact of "digital chronic pain treatment system equipment" based on MR mixed reality technology in the clinical basic treatment of patients clinically diagnosed with chronic pain.

The aim of the study is to check whether vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) combined with manual therapy (TM), given its neuroanatomical relationship with the structures involved in pain in the TMJ, is more effective in reducing pain, increasing joint range and increasing the quality ofthe patient lives than TM alone. The research team is made up of three physiotherapists. It has been decided to distribute the tasks as follows: * Physiotherapist 1 will be in charge of the treatment of all patients. * Physiotherapist 2 will be responsible for screening the sample and evaluating the study. * Physiotherapist 3 will be in charge of analyzing the results and statistics. This component of the team, being blinded and not knowing the group of origin of the patient, will be able to interpret the results without any type of convenience bias, showing absolutely transparency in the elaboration of the conclusions. Once the screening will be completed, the patients will be divided into two groups: an experimental group (TM + ENV) and a control group (TM + ENV placebo).The randomization will be carried out through the statistical program Epidat 4,237 9 obtaining two homogeneous groups. Each patient will be assigned a code with the aim that the physiotherapist who is in charge of the statistical analysis is not able to establish links between the data and the subjects to which it refers.

The study will be divided into three parts: Part A: Single Ascending Dose - healthy participants cohorts with up to 5 dose levels. Part B: Multiple Ascending Doses - healthy participants cohorts with up to 3 dose levels. Part C: Surgical patients cohorts with up to 3 dose levels. The primary Objective is to investigate the safety and tolerability of TT5 in single and multiple ascending intravenous doses in healthy participants and in surgical patients. The Secondary Objectives are To investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of TT5 after single and multiple ascending intravenous doses in healthy participants and after intravenous doses in surgical patients. * To investigate the acute and chronic psychological subjective response of the healthy participants and surgical patients to TT5 * To assess the pharmacodynamics (PD) of TT5 after intravenous doses in surgical patients. Exploratory Objectives areto explore potential fluid biomarkers for TT5

This project seeks to contribute to the evidence base regarding the utility of active distraction techniques, such as Grasp, in pediatric clinical settings. Findings may inform the development of non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving the patient experience and reducing procedural distress among children. Grasp is a communication tool comprising both hardware and software components. The hardware consists of a handheld, soft silicone ball embedded with pressure sensors capable of detecting squeezes of varying intensity and duration. The software component is a dedicated application designed for use on an iPad, which forms an integral part of the system. Squeezing the ball generates visual and auditory feedback in real time via the application, presented through dynamic curves and sound cues, including musical elements. Data from the pressure sensors is transmitted live to the software via Bluetooth, enabling immediate sensory feedback. Grasp is CE-marked and registered as a medical device under ID NO918873724/0943-55311 by the Norwegian Directorate of Medical Products. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Grasp as an active distraction tool in reducing perceived pain and distress in children undergoing minor but potentially distressing medical procedures. We aim to recruit children aged 8-15 years from Children and Youth Clinic (CYC) at Helse Bergen HF, Helsebanken General Practice, and TkVestland Dental Center. The procedures involved include peripheral venous cannulation (CYC), venipuncture for blood sampling (Helsebanken), and administration of local anesthesia via injection (dental clinic). Participants will be allocated using block randomization. The intervention group will engage with the Grasp system by repeatedly squeezing the ball before and during the procedure, triggering musical feedback. The control group will undergo standard care without the use of Grasp. We aim to recruit 50 participants at CYC, 50 participants at TK Vestland dental clinic and 20 participants at Helsebanken General Practices.In addition, we will explore the use of Grasp in six patients admitted to hospital with a newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus type 1 who will use Grasp during blood sugar measurement or subcutaneous insulin administration. (These six participants will not participate in the randomized controlled part of the study.) The primary outcome measure will be self-reported pain, assessed using a combined visual analogue scale (VAS) and numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10). The secondary outcomes will include self-reported distress, measured using a combined VAS/NRS scale, as well as parents' or legal guardians' assessments of their child's pain and distress, also rated on a similar scale. Additionally, six participants recruited at CYC who have prior experience with peripheral venous cannulation and underwent the procedure using Grap, will be invited to take part in individual semi-structured interviews. These interviews will explore their subjective experiences with the intervention. The participant will fill out a paper form questionnaire prior to randomization regarding their prior experience, anticipated pain and how anxious they are about the upcoming procedure. Immediately after the needle prick procedure participants and parents will fill out the second form regarding their experience during this procedure. The participant at the dental office will be offered to use the Grasp further through the dental treatment and all participants and parents at the dental office will complete a final similar questionnaire after the completion of dental treatment. Multiple linear regression analyses will performed to examine the impact of the intervention adjusted for baseline scores. Statistical analyses will be done in R version 4.2.3. Systematic text condensation will be used to analyse the interviews.

This study is a 3-part, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamic properties of iN1011-N17 after Oral Administration in Healthy Volunteers and Post-Herpetic Neuralgia patients, and to assess the relative bioavailability of Mesylate vs Hydrochloride salt capsules of iN1011-N17 in Healthy volunteers.

Using the use of pain visual analog scale (VAS), digital pain grading method (NRS), neuropathic pain assessment scale (DN4), sleep quality (Pittsburgh sleep quality index, Ascens insomnia scale), social support assessment scale (SSQ), Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), Barrett impulse scale (BIS), anxiety and depression score (GAD-7, PHQ-9), emotional tasks, cognitive function (N-back, time perception, delay-discount), electroencephalogram (EEG), near-infrared brain function imaging (fNIRS) and other indicators to study the dynamic changes of various factors in the process of acute pain.

The Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) is a publicly funded specialist outpatient health service, which is uniquely available for the work force. The overall aim of the NSAC is prevention of sickness absence, promote return to work (RTW) among those on sickness absence and prevent long term disability benefit dependency. In addition to being a health service, the NSAC has a focus on work and functional recovery, including also non-health related factors. Patients can be referred by general practitioners for mental health problems and musculoskeletal problems. The NSAC has a lower threshold for severity than specialist health services generally, and in particular for mental health problems. The efficacy of this service is unknown. The NSAC Efficacy Study is part of a broader project, the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic Study (NSACS). The NSACS currently has two sources of funding: Northern Norway Regional Health Authority and The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration and involves two RCTs: NSAC Efficacy and NSAC Nudge and fifteen work packages concerning health economics, scalability, implementation, profiling of patient groups, and non-RCT related research questions to improve understanding of the patient group and their challenges. To do this the project will use patient survey data, clinician-reported procedures, opinions and outcomes, linked to registry data for work benefits and health service use. The randomized controlled trial NSAC Efficacy is the subject of this trial registration. The NSAC Efficacy Study is a naturalistic randomized controlled multicentre trial, carried out in northern Norway and involving five NSACs. The study invites 2500 patients, randomized to either of three treatment arms: 1. NSAC rapid: treatment at the NSAC at- or within 4 weeks 2. NSAC ordinary: treatment at the NSAC after 10-14 weeks 3. NSAC - active control: monodisciplinary examination at the NSAC close to diagnosis-specific deadline for examination as suggested by guidelines (8-26 weeks, the majority at the end of this interval) The NSACs are staffed by teams of medical doctors specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation, psychologists, physiotherapists, and employment counsellors with experience from case management in the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration (NAV). All patients are asked to complete an electronic survey about their mental health and musculoskeletal pain, work conditions, motivation for work and barriers for return to work (RTW). The control group only completes the survey on health, and only on either mental health or musculoskeletal pain, according to referral diagnosis. The survey tool manages the randomization algorithm. The NSAC is a relatively new clinical service, available for the labour force, and publicly funded with the intention to reduce sickness absence and prevent retirement from the labour force and transitions to disability benefits. The NSAC clinic welcomes patients with the most common diagnoses for sickness absence and is supposed to have a low threshold. There is no single alternative clinical service for similar patients outside the labour force, thus no single treatment as usual (TAU) alternative. Service availability will depend on diagnosis and severity: * The majority of patients eligible for treatment in the NSAC referred with mental disorders would not be eligible for treatment in specialist psychiatric services as conditions in most cases would be too mild. The most common treatment alternative would be treatment at the general practitioners. * For patients referred for musculoskeletal problems, some may be eligible for consultations and treatment at physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinics. For those not eligible, the general practitioner is the most common alternative, and other options such as private physiotherapists. Eligibility criteria may vary between catchment areas. * All alternatives to the NSAC would be without employment counsellors, little cross disciplinary assessment, and little to no focus on work and functional rehabilitation. The active control group aims to be comparable to TAU, and differs from the NSAC in the following respects: 1. Patients receive a monodisciplinary examination from either a doctor, physiotherapist of psychologist at the NSAC. The focus of the examination is on health-related factors. The patients will not receive further follow-up at the clinic beyond the first examination. Upon indication, the patient is referred to other treatment or examination outside of the NSAC. 2. Employment counsellors are not involved in patient consultations or in discussions about patients. 3. Patients in the active control group will not be posed questions concerning work, motivation for work or barriers for return to work. Patients will during registration in Tivian be classified as having predominantly either musculoskeletal- or common mental disorders, and this will dictate the type of questions posed: musculoskeletal patients will be asked questions on musculoskeletal factors but not psychological factors, while patients will common mental disorders will be asked questions about psychological factors but not musculoskeletal issues. For patients being examined by a psychologist, if issues concerning musculoskeletal health arise, the patient is asked to discuss these with his/her GP. If issues concerning mental health arise which requires competence beyond what the physiotherapist possesses, the physiotherapist may confer with the medical doctor at NSAC. 4. The clinician is not to take initiative to discussing work-related factors with the patient, and as far as possible avoid these becoming central topics of the consultation. If the patient on his/her own initiative brings up such topics, the clinician is not restricted from addressing them. 5. Employment counsellors are not part of patient discussions prior to examination. 6. Meetings or discussions about patients are kept within profession; i.e. a physiotherapist is allowed to discuss his/her patient with other physiotherapists if need be. The data necessary to answer the research questions are gathered from national registries via personal identifier, registry data on population level, questionnaires filled out by the patient (data on health and working conditions) and questionnaires filled out by the clinician (data on number of treatments, diagnosis, professions involved, and types of treatment provided). The patient questionnaire covers 9 themes, split in two sections. Section 1 covers health, and includes musculoskeletal problems, mental health, and other health related issues (such as alcohol consumption, medication, and physical activity). Section 2 includes working conditions (including inter alia questions on social support, work/family conflict and bullying), barriers for RTW, labour market affiliation, other personal aspects (such as demography and motivation for work), questionnaires for health economic evaluation (such as the EQ-5D) and expectations for treatment. By and large the questionnaire consists of test batteries which have been validated for specific topics. To reduce the number of questions posed to each patient, the baseline questionnaire will employ index questions which have proven psychometric properties in terms of factor loading or similar, meaning that if a problem on a specific topic such as neck pain is not indicated, the patient will not be presented with the Neck Disability Index questionnaire. The patient questionnaires will be filled out electronically at before first treatment and at 6- and 12 months after first treatment. In addition, before treatments, patients will be given shorter versions of the same questionnaire to be filled out at the clinic. These shorter questionnaires will consist of questions to which the patient at baseline indicated a high score, and thus includes more relevant information to the clinician. In the NSAC Efficacy Study, receiving treatment at NSACs presupposes consent to participate in research, as the effect of the treatment is as of date unknown. Hence, receiving treatment at the NSAC is not necessarily superior to other available health services. Other available health services that may be utilized by patients serving in the control groups include mono-disciplinary treatment by physiotherapists, psychologists, general practitioners, gyms, electronically delivered self-help tools etc. All patients referred to NSACs will be offered treatment, but patients that decline to participate in research are provided an examination in line with randomization arm #3.

An elevated Body Mass Index (BMI) in the child population represents a significant global public health concern. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), overweight occurs in children aged 6-19 when the BMI exceeds one or more standard deviations from the median established in WHO child growth patterns. Epidemiological data reflects that since the late 20th century, childhood obesity has increased from 4.9% (31.5 million) to 6% (40.6 million) worldwide. According to data from the Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) within the European Union (EU), children in Spain aged 6-9 have a 42% overweight rate and a 19% obesity rate. In comparison, girls have a 41% overweight rate and a 17% obesity rate, positioning Spain as the fourth EU country with the highest prevalence of overweight and obesity in children. Within the national territory, 4 out of 10 schoolchildren have excess weight, with the highest prevalence in the southern regions. The autonomous community with the lowest incidence of childhood overweight is Navarra, with 15%, and the highest is the Region of Murcia, with 40%. Andalusians present a high prevalence rate of 33.4%. In general, the country's northern regions have lower figures, while the southern region has the highest rates of childhood overweight. It has also been observed that there is a higher likelihood of being overweight in rural areas than in urban areas. This could be due to regional differences in habits during the three critical periods for the development of childhood obesity: the preconception period involving maternal factors, the first 1000 days of life (9 months of pregnancy + 2 years of life), and the adiposity rebound between 5-7 years. Childhood overweight is also highly influenced by factors such as maternal overweight, early introduction of complementary feeding before 6 months of age, smoking during pregnancy, low parental educational levels, and the excessive use of screens such as mobile phones or tablets at an early age. The most relevant factors in overweight are diet, physical inactivity, physical activity, and lifestyle habits. However, when it comes to minors, all these factors are strongly influenced by the cultural, social, and institutional environment, as well as the family's socioeconomic level. In Spain, Andalusia is one of the autonomous communities with a lower income index (0.67) and a lower average expenditure on public health at 0.33%. However, the community puts in the most effort to implement policies against obesity, with a score of 5.19. Numerous campaigns have been launched to prevent childhood obesity, developed by the Spanish Agency for Consumer Affairs, Food Safety, and Nutrition (AECOSAN) as part of the nutrition, physical activity, and obesity prevention (NAOS) strategy. Additionally, the Andalusian Ministry of Health and Families has implemented plans such as "Growing in Health," "Evaluation of Food Offer in Andalusian Schools 2019-2020," and the "Health throughout Life" campaign. All these programs coincide on three fundamental aspects when addressing childhood obesity: interventions to modify dietary habits promoting balanced and healthy eating, increasing fruit and vegetable consumption while minimizing sugar intake; interventions to promote physical activity, encouraging at least one hour of exercise daily; and, lastly, family involvement interventions to achieve proper adherence to these changes. These interventions are necessary today because, over the past decades, there have been changes in eating patterns and diets, resulting in a decrease in the consumption of fruits, vegetables, legumes, and fresh products, as well as an increase in the consumption of processed foods with higher sugar, fat, salt content, and poorer nutritional quality. According to COSI initiative data, Spain is where children consume the least fruits and vegetables daily. There have also been changes in physical activity, with studies showing that 25% of Spanish children are sedentary. One of the direct consequences of childhood overweight is morphological heart alterations, reflected in left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac diastolic alterations. Numerous scientific studies have established a close relationship between obesity in children and adolescents and an increase in epicardial fat, which can lead to cardiac and vascular abnormalities. In fact, having a high BMI at a young age has become a significant risk factor for the premature development of cardiovascular diseases that were previously considered exclusive to adults. These changes are visible through echocardiography, especially in epicardial fat. As a non-invasive diagnostic tool, Echocardiography has gained a fundamental role in early detection of these alterations in the pediatric population affected by an increase in epicardial fat. Its early implementation allows for precise cardiac and vascular function assessment, improving these young patients' quality of life and prognosis. These measurements and modifications have been analyzed recently, although more data on younger populations and post-pandemic needs to be collected. Furthermore, to address this growing challenge, it is crucial to raise awareness about the importance of maintaining a healthy weight early and promote research and the application of preventive and intervention strategies to reduce epicardial fat in the pediatric population. Due to all the aforementioned reasons, coupled with the limited number of current publications that deeply analyze the consequences of childhood obesity on the development of the musculoskeletal system and children's mobility, it is essential to conduct a study of the population and subsequently intervene to promote healthy growth and development in children. Therefore, the objective is to establish the impact of a nutritional intervention by a school nurse on a group of schoolchildren.