Low Birth Weight

Birthweight below the 10th (small for gestational age or SGA) or above the 90th (large for gestational age or LGA) percentile for gestational age has been associated with adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. As birthweight reflects intrauterine development, accurate identification of abnormal fetal growth would allow obstetric providers to prevent adverse outcomes and mitigate complications associated with abnormal development. Symphysis fundal height (SFH) measured in centimeters after 24 weeks of gestation is recommended as the standard of care to screen for fetal growth abnormalities among low-risk pregnancies. This method is low-cost, and easy to perform, but there is a lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness due to its poor sensitivity. Ultrasonography, the technique utilized to identify fetal growth abnormalities, is a costly procedure which involves the use of advanced equipment and providers, to perform and review the ultrasound, as well as a full examination with multiple measurements and images. Despite a few encouraging reports, insufficient evidence supports routine 3rd trimester ultrasound in low- risk pregnancies to improve detection of abnormal fetal growth. Sonographic measurement of the abdominal circumference (AC) in the fetus was shown to be the single most useful indicator of fetal growth. Measurement of AC does not require extensive training, long time to acquire, or expensive ultrasound machines. It can be easily performed in the office by midwives who are specifically trained in obtaining the measurement. Therefore, we intended to evaluate if the use of bedside point of care ultrasound (POC-US) by midwives to evaluate fetal AC during routine antenatal visits in low-risk pregnancies would increase the accuracy of SFH in identifying fetuses with birthweight \< 10th or \> 90th, when compared to SFH alone. This is an open label, investigator sponsored, two arms randomized controlled trial. Patients who satisfy all inclusion criteria, have no exclusion criteria, and have signed the written informed consent will be randomly assigned to screening of fetal growth abnormalities during routine antenatal appointments held by midwives according to SFH or SFH + POC-US-AC. Low risk pregnant women are interviewed by a midwife at 35-38 weeks' gestation, who also reviews their medical and obstetrical history, prenatal labs and the ultrasound reports to discriminate between high and low-risk pregnancies. Patients who satisfy all inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of two different approaches to identify fetal growth abnormalities and predict abnormal birthweight, after signing the written informed consent. Screening test in the control group: Symphysis fundal height measurement. Fundal height is measured by trained midwives at each scheduled antenatal appointment from the pubis symphysis to the top of the uterine fundus, using a paper measuring tape in centimeters. Size greater than dates is suspected if the measurement is above the 90th gestational age specific percentile according to the Intergrowth 21 SFH references (Papageorghiu 2016). Similarly, size less than dates is recorded if the measurement is below the 10th percentile for age according to the Intergrowth 21 SFH references (Papageorghiu 2016). Formal obstetric ultrasound is requested if the SFH is \> 90th percentile, if it is \< 10th , or if it drops 50 growth centiles in two subsequent evaluations. Screening test in the intervention group: Symphysis fundal height measurement + point of care ultrasound. After assessing SFH at each clinical encounter, the midwife will perform a POC-US to measure the fetal AC and evaluate the quantity of amniotic fluid. A positive screen for fetal growth restriction (indicative of a potential SGA infant) consists in a measured AC less than the 10th percentile for gestational age according to the standards defined by Nicolini et al in 1986 on an Italian population; instead, a positive screen for macrosomia (suggestive of a potential LGA infant) is an AC greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age according to the references set by Nicolini et al in 1996. Formal obstetric ultrasound is requested if the AC is \> 90th percentile, if it is \< 10th, or if it drops 50 growth centiles in two subsequent evaluations. Amniotic fluid volume will be evaluated determining the deepest vertical pocket (DVP). A formal US is requested in case uterine size is measured as ≤ than the 10th or ≥ than the 90th percentile for gestational age according to Intergrowth 21, when POC - US reveals AC \< 10th percentile, AC \> 90th percentile according to Nicolini et al, in case DVP \< 2 x 1 cm, or DVP \> 8 x 1 cm, or also if SFH or AC drop \> 50 percentiles comparing two subsequent evaluations. Patients randomized to SFH + POC-US will have a formal US if either technique suspects abnormal fetal growth. Formal US requested due to an abnormal screening test will be distinguished from scans ordered due to other indications, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, or cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosed after enrollment. Hadlock' s references will be used to estimate fetal weight, and therefore to define FGR (i.e estimated fetal weight or AC \< 10th percentile) as well as macrosomia (i.e estimated fetal weight or AC \> 90th percentile). Prenatal evaluation of fetal growth will be compared to the birthweight percentile according to the INeS neonatal charts (Bertino 2010) to identify SGA, LGA and AGA (appropriate for gestational age) infants. After the initial evaluation low risk pregnancies are scheduled for antenatal appointments with a midwife at 40, 41 and 41+ weeks' gestation. All patients will have a POC-US by a midwife at 41, and 41+ weeks' gestation to screen for amniotic fluid abnormalities associated with protracted pregnancy, independently of the randomization arm. A midwife will perform SFH or SFH + POCT-US (according to randomization) at enrolment (35-38 weeks' gestation) and at 40 weeks. As sonographic assessment of fetal growth should not be performed more frequently than every 2 weeks due to the error associated with measurements; POC-US will only evaluate amniotic fluid volume at 41 and 41+3 weeks' gestation (unless the patient has missed a previous appointment), even among women randomized to SFH + POC-US. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the most accurate approach to identify prenatally those pregnancies that will result in SGA or LGA infants. Prenatal evaluation consists in a universal screening test for fetal growth abnormalities (either SFH or SFH + POC US) followed by a confirmatory test (formal obstetric US) performed only when the initial screening test is positive. Fetal growth or amniotic fluid abnormalities are diagnosed in utero if confirmed by a formal obstetric ultrasound, and not when only suspected by a screening test; in fact, the study seeks to evaluate what is the most accurate combination of screening and confirmatory tests, and not the effectiveness of the screening test alone.

Purpose: Over the last 10 years, recommendations regarding the ideal level of oxygen for resuscitation in preterm infants have changed from 100 percent, down to low levels of oxygen (\<30 percent), up to moderate concentration (30-65 percent). In addition, in 2010, oxygen saturation targeting was recommended as standard of care and this contributed to a change in clinical practice as clinicians were more likely and comfortable to start resuscitation at either 21percent (room air) or titrated levels of oxygen such as 30-40 percent. When the guidelines were again revised in 2015, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) acknowledged that a critical knowledge gap continued to exist for the resuscitation of the preterm infants \<37 weeks, highlighting the need to provide more concrete guidelines. This leaves clinicians in a challenging position. Despite the advances that have been achieved in perinatal and neonatal care, neonates are still vulnerable to the consequences of the oxidative effects from hyperoxia as well as the deleterious effects from hypoxia. A large, multi-centre international trial of sufficient sample size that is powered to look at safety outcomes such as mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes is required to provide the necessary evidenced to guide clinical practice with confidence. Hypothesis: the null hypothesis for this study is that the incidence of mortality or abnormal neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24+/- 6 months corrected age will be no different by using either higher initial oxygen concentration of 60 percent compared to using lower initial oxygen concentration of 30 percent for resuscitation of preterm infants of 23 0/7- 28 6/7 weeks gestation. Justification: The use of supplementary oxygen may be crucial, but also potentially detrimental to premature infants at birth. High oxygen levels may lead to organ damage through oxidative stress, while low oxygen levels may lead to increased mortality. Excess oxygen exposure during the early post-birth period is associated with many complications and morbidities of preterm birth. Preterm infants have lower levels of anti-oxidant pathways consistent with their expected fetal environment of low oxygen exposure. Excess of oxygen free-radicals in infants intrinsically deficient in enzymatic antioxidants and non-enzymatic antioxidants may contribute to these morbidities. Pulmonary oxygen toxicity, through the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in excess of antioxidant defenses, is believed to be a major contributor to the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Using lower oxygen concentrations at birth results in decreased oxidative stress markers and a decrease risk of developing BPD compared to higher oxygen concentrations. Other organs that may be damaged by such oxidative stress include kidneys, myocardium and the retina. There is equally growing evidence that using lower oxygen concentrations will lead to lower oxygen saturation levels and bradycardia, which may lead to increased rates of mortality in this vulnerable group of infants. An individual patient analysis of clinical trials reported that 46% of preterm infants resuscitated with initial low oxygen concentration did not reach SpO2 of 80% at 5 min. This was associated with increased risk of major intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and an almost five times higher risk of death in this vulnerable group of infants. These data provide a warning note for the use of higher vs. lower initial oxygen concentration during delivery room resuscitation. As the investigator proceed in determining a safe range for resuscitation of ELBW/ELGA infants, it is highly likely that the optimum level of oxygen concentration is between the two extremes of 21 percent and 100 percent. Objectives: To determine whether initial resuscitation of preterm neonates with 60 percent versus 30 percent oxygen results in better neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24+/- 6 months. Research Method/Procedures: This will be a cluster crossover design, unmasked randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two oxygen concentrations at initiation of resuscitation. Infants will be placed on the resuscitation table with the initial steps of resuscitation carried out as per standard of care at each centre which usually follows current resuscitation guidelines. All centres will make every effort to establish adequate lung expansion using CPAP or positive pressure ventilation as needed. Enrolled infants will have a pulse oximeter sensor placed on the right arm in the first minute of life. Their resuscitation will be initiated with an oxygen concentration of 30 or 60 percent depending on the randomization sequence at the centre at the given time. Infants in the 30 percent group will remain in 30 percent oxygen until 5 min of age unless the infant's heart rate (HR) remains 100/min or less and does not show a tendency towards progressive increase before reaching 5 min of age or infant needs chest compression and/or epinephrine. No alteration in oxygen concentration will be made for an infant who is responding to resuscitation efforts with HR progressively increasing as minutes go by. At 5 min of age, the clinical team will assess oxygen saturation. If the saturation is less than 85 percent, oxygen should be increased by 10-20 percent every 60 sec to achieve saturations of 85 percent or greater or a saturation of 90-95 percent at 10 min of age. If saturations are greater than 95 percent at or before 5 min of age, oxygen should be decreased stepwise (every 60 sec) with an aim to maintain saturations of 85 percent or greater during 5-10 min of age or 90-95 percent at and beyond 10 min of age. The procedure for infants in the 60 percent group will be identical. The intervention duration for the trial will be the first 5 min after birth followed by initial monitoring/action for the next 5 min where titration in oxygen concentration will be made to achieve stability making a total of 10 min for study intervention. Titration of oxygen before 5 min after birth will only be made if the infant remains bradycardic (HR less than 100) and does not show a tendency towards a sustained increase in HR or if the oxygen saturation exceeds 95 percent. If the infant does not respond to ventilation with increasing HR in the first 5 min after birth, steps to ensure effective ventilation should be done before oxygen is titrated. Plan for Data Analysis: Generalized linear mixed model with binary outcome and maximum likelihood estimate will be used to evaluate the effect of an oxygen concentration on the primary outcome (as a composite at 24+/- 6 months corrected age of all-cause mortality or the presence of a major neurodevelopmental outcome). To account for cluster crossover design of the study, effects of centers (clusters) and a period (oxygen concentration) within center will be considered random, and effects of a period (oxygen concentration) will be entered as a fixed effect. This hierarchical model allows for the correlation of patients within periods and within clusters. The model will be adjusted for gestational age and whether or not infant required mask ventilation as potential confounding variables. Similar generalized linear mixed models will be performed to evaluate the effect of group on secondary outcomes. In addition, three subgroup analysis will be performed: i) Gestational age will be categorized into 2 categories: 23+0- 25+6 vs. 26+0-28+6 weeks; ii) Breathing support will be categorized by infants supported only with CPAP vs. received mask ventilation; iii) Sex/Gender will be categorized into 2 categories: female vs. male. For subgroup analysis baseline characteristics will be compared using linear and generalized linear mixed models. Sensitivity analysis will be performed to analyze the missing data; however, a very low number of missing values are expected due to the design of the study.

The goal of this nationwide multicenter observational study is to comprehensively investigate the severity of Small Vulnerable Newborns (SVN) issues across China and to propose further preventive and intervention measures. The primary aim is to provide a thorough description of SVN problems using a unified definition and framework, and to develop targeted prevention strategies. Participating centers across the country will collect clinical data on vulnerable newborns under their care and complete detailed questionnaires to support this research.

Investigators are using a pseudo randomized yoked design and will include two groups: choice of intervention strategy or no-choice. If the individual is randomized to no choice, then the next person would get a choice and the no choice person would be assigned to the group yoked (matched) to the person with a choice. Participants assigned to the choice group will choose one of three intervention strategies provided; either Group A (receiving both nutrition and exercise simultaneously), B (starting with nutrition and receiving exercise sequentially followed by nutrition starting at 25 weeks) or C (starting with nutrition first and then introducing exercise sequentially at 25 weeks). All groups will follow the full NELIP until delivery. Participants in the no-choice group will be yoked (matched) to a participant in the choice group and receive the strategy that their yoked counterparts chose. Nutrition component of NELIP: This component is a modified gestational diabetic meal plan that has four general goals tailored to the participant: (1) to achieve approximately 2000 kcal of energy per day. The determination of the amount of kcal consumed per day will consider the participant's intake from the dietary assessment. There also must not be a restriction of calories that exceeds 30% of their total energy intake; (2) participants will consume approximately 200-250g/day of carbohydrates, accounting for approximately 40-55% of total energy intake. Carbohydrate intake will be distributed throughout three meals and four snacks daily. The nutritionist will educate participants about the importance of complex and low-glycemic index carbohydrates through the one-on-one session; (3) fat and protein intake will be approximately 30% and 20-30% of total energy intake, respectively; (4) achieve appropriate micronutrient and fluid intake for pregnancy. This will be monitored by a weekly 24 hour food intake record. Exercise component of NELIP: This is a walking program that comprises of 1 weekly supervised session on a treadmill or outside and participants will be recommended to walk 2 to 3 additional times per week. The walking program will start at 25 minutes per session, 3 to 4 times weekly, and increase by 2 minutes per week until 40 minutes and then maintained until delivery. This will be monitored by a wrist monitoring device. The primary outcome is adherence measured weekly using a published adherence protocol using a point system. Secondary outcomes are participant satisfaction to the program and health outcomes: weekly weight gain, calculated EGWG, and pregnancy outcomes (birth weight length, infant anthropometrics, APGAR scores and delivery complications). At 2, 6 and 12 months of age the maternal-infant dyad will return to the lab and infant morphometric measurements recorded from birth will be repeated.

The current prospective cohort study aims to investigate the dynamic serum kisspeptin levels in the patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) at different trimesters of pregnancy, to analyze the associations between serum kisspeptin, insulin, glucose and testosterone, and to explore the predictive value of kisspeptin for GDM and other complications in PCOS patients.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of Karl Storz curved (11508AAK) and straight (11506AAK) fetoscopes for in-utero surgery. The investigators will assess the surgical outcomes, short and long-term morbidity, complications, and gestational age of participants who undergo intrauterine procedures with these devices. The scopes will be used to assist in intrauterine procedures across a variety of fetal conditions, such as TTTS (twin-twin transfusion syndrome), TAPS (twin anemia polycythemia sequence), sFGR (selective fetal growth restriction) or TRAP sequence (twin reversed arterial perfusion). Fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP) can also be used during in-utero surgery to correct abnormal vessels in cases like chorioangioma or vasa previa. Other complex congenital anomalies may require fetal intervention or diagnostic fetoscopy using Storz scopes. Improvements in the technique, experience and equipment have been associated with better maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in fetal surgery. Smaller fetoscopes are associated with lower rates of premature delivery following FLP. New fetoscopes (11508AAK and 11506AAK) have the potential to improve visualization and the photocoagulation angle. Compared to alternative scopes, these Storz scopes provide a wider angle of view and are longer, enabling better reach to distant areas at the edge of the placenta, especially in cases of higher BMI, higher gestational age, and significant polyhydramnios. This study is an un-blinded, non-randomized, single arm, feasibility study on a convenience cohort to demonstrate the role of a curved fetoscope device (11508AAK) or straight fetoscope device (11506AAK) among in-utero surgeries. Patients will be enrolled in a consecutive manner and all qualifying, patients who agreed to the use of the curved or straight fetoscopes will be enrolled in the study. Outcome data will be reported as a descriptive statistical analysis. The curved fetoscope (11508AAK) device will be used in monochorionic pregnancies with an anterior placenta requiring in-utero surgery, while the straight fetoscope (11506AAK) will be used in monochorionic pregnancies with a posterior placenta. This device is classified as a significant risk device because it is of substantial importance in diagnosing, curing, mitigating, or treating disease, or otherwise preventing impairment of human health and presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject.

Subjects: SGA children from 6 months to 2 years old who meet the enrollment conditions shall be informed of the enrollment by the researcher and the subject's guardian, and the subject's guardian shall decide to participate in the test drug group or the control group. GH treatment group (n = 68): the subjects were given PEG-rhGH injection 0.2 mg / kg / week (initial dose), once a week, subcutaneously before going to bed for 104 weeks. Each follow-up, the researchers adjusted the dosage according to the IGF-1 results of the center and other individual conditions. Control group (n = 68): no treatment, only follow-up examination and growth and development related evaluation, and the follow-up time was 104 Week.

INTRODUCTION Many newborn infants have difficulty breathing after birth. Some of these babies have a tube inserted into their "windpipe" (trachea) - an endotracheal tube (ETT) - through which they are given breathing support (ventilation). When clinicians attempt to intubate (insert an ETT), they use an instrument called a laryngoscope to view the airway in order to identify the entrance to the trachea (larynx). Standard laryngoscopes have a "blade" (which, despite its name, is not sharp) with a light at the tip. Doctors insert the blade into the baby's mouth to view the larynx. Traditionally, clinicians used a standard laryngoscope to look directly into the baby's mouth to view the larynx (direct laryngoscopy, DL). When clinicians attempt to intubate newborns with DL, less than half of first attempts are successful. Also adverse effects - such as falls in the blood oxygen levels (fall in oxygen saturation (SpO2), or "desaturation"), slowing down of the heart rate (bradycardia), oral trauma - are relatively common. In recent years, video laryngoscopes (VL) have been developed. In addition to a light, VL have a video camera at the tip of the blade. This camera acquires a view of the larynx and displays it on a screen that the clinician views when attempting intubation (indirect laryngoscopy). In a randomised study performed at the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, more infants were successfully intubated at the first attempt when clinicians used VL compared to DL \[79/107 (74%) versus 48/107 (45%), P\<0.001\]. While this study was large enough to show that VL resulted infants being successfully intubated at the first attempt in one hospital, it couldn't give information about how it might work in a range of hospitals, and it wasn't large enough to see what effect VL had on adverse events. There is a large difference in cost between a standard laryngoscope (approx. €300) and a video laryngoscope (approx. €21,000). This is a matter of concern for all hospitals, particularly in settings where resources are more limited. The investigators aim to assess whether VL compared to DL results in more infants being intubated at the first attempt without physiological instability. STUDY DESIGN A recent single centre study reported that that more newborn infants were successfully intubated at the first attempt when VL was used to indirectly view the airway compared to DL. This study was not large enough to determine the effect of VL on adverse effects that are seen commonly (e.g. desaturation) or more rarely (e.g. bradycardia, receipt of chest compressions or adrenaline, oral trauma) during intubation attempts. For the current study, the investigators chose a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled design, where the participating centre, rather than the individual infant, will be the unit of randomisation. This design has been found appropriate to test the effects of an intervention that encompasses a behavioural aspect and to implement interventions while studying them at the same time. In this study, all centres will begin in the "control group"; where clinicians will routinely attempt intubation with DL, as is their usual practice. At specified intervals, centres will be randomly assigned to cross over to the "intervention group", where clinicians will routinely attempt intubation with VL. All participating centers will have included patients in both arms by the end of the study. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION To determine the intra-cluster correlation (that means the correlation between two observations from the same centre), the investigators used the dataset of the MONITOR trial that included infants from 7 delivery rooms worldwide. In this trial, the intra-cluster correlation for intubation in the delivery room was reported as 0.1. This complete stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design includes 21 time periods (including the baseline) and 20 centres that will be including patients, with each randomised to a unique sequence. Each time period lasts a fortnight. Each time period, 1 centre will switch their treatment from DL to VL. With all centres including 2 patients each time period, 42 patients will be included per centre which will provide a total sample size of 840 patients. Assuming a control proportion of 0.4, this sample will achieve 90% power (0.9091) to detect a treatment proportion of 0.55, assuming a conservative ICC of 0.05. The power is not very sensitive to ICC values up to 0.1 (power of \>90% to detect difference 40% versus 56%). The test statistic used is the two-sided Wald Z-Test. TREATMENT OF SUBJECTS DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY (DL, control period) At the start of the study, clinicians at participating centres will attempt intubation using a standard laryngoscope to perform DL as is their normal practice. VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY (VL, intervention period) For each centre, a lot will be drawn which indicates the month in which endotracheal intubation will be routinely attempted with VL rather than DL. In the month before the switch, centres will be provided with a C-MAC VL by the manufacturers, Karl Storz-Endoskop (Tuttlingen, Germany). The system will be provided on loan for the duration of the study and will consist of an 8" high-definition monitor with connecting cable and reusable straight Miller type blades size 0 and size 1. The equipment will be demonstrated by representatives from Karl Storz, and clinicians who intubate babies at participating hospitals will be encouraged to practice with the equipment on mannequins. We will have an virtual meeting with each centre in the week before they are due to switch to review the protocol, data collection and to answer any queries that they may have. All other procedures in the delivery room and NICU will be performed according to international and local guidelines. All other aspects of the approach to intubation at the participating centre are at the discretion of the local clinicians and should remain the same for the duration of the study; e.g.: * The drugs used before intubation attempts (e.g. opiate, atropine, curare-like drug) * The route by which intubation is usually attempted (i.e. oral or nasal) * Whether they use a stylet is routinely used * Whether supplemental oxygen is given during attempts

Improvements in treatments for people with CF have meant that more are becoming pregnant. CFTR modulators (CFTRm) are one of these treatments. They work by tackling the underlying cause of CF. These changes have created a need and an opportunity for research into the health and experiences of people with CF and their children in the CFTRm era. The study is called 'MATRIARCH\_CF' and includes 3 related sub-studies: 'Mama' is enrolling participants aged 16 years or older with CF under the care of the Royal Brompton Hospital (RBH) adult CF Unit who are planning a pregnancy or pregnant. The aim is to describe the impact of pregnancy and the first 12-24 months of parenthood in females with CF on their physical and psychological health. Investigations in eight visits include blood tests, lung function, imaging, and interviews. 'Mini' is enrolling biological offspring of people with CF (mothers and fathers) cared for by the RBH Adult CF Service, from birth to age two. The aim is to collect information that will allow for assessment of health outcomes in offspring of parents with CF in the short term. There will be up to four visits over two years with investigations including blood tests, sweat tests, and brain ultrasound. 'Midi' explores the same question as 'Mini' but in the longer term for those aged three-to-six. There will be up to two visits, and they include lung function testing and a lung MRI. This study is described as 'observational' as investigators will not provide or change any treatment. Participant's health will be monitored with a range of investigations, many of which are optional. Knowledge gained from this study will be used to create guidelines to help families with CF and their medical teams make decisions around pregnancy and their offspring.

This is an observational study to collect data from Japanese babies with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) who will be treated with Eylea. In observational studies, only observations are made without specified advice or interventions. ROP is a condition that affects the eye and occurs only in babies who are born too early. Most cases of ROP are mild and get better without treatment, but more serious cases need to be treated in time. ROP happens when the blood vessels in the "retina" grow abnormally. The retina is the layer of tissue at the back of the eye that picks up light and sends messages to the brain. In babies with ROP, these abnormal blood vessels can leak. This causes damage to the retina and can sometimes move it out of place causing medical problems such as blindness. Eylea is received as an injection into the eye. It works by blocking a certain protein (VEGF) that can cause blood vessels in the retina to grow abnormally. Eylea is already available in Japan and is approved for doctors to prescribe to babies with ROP. The participants in this study are Japanese babies with ROP that their doctors decided to treat with Eylea before the start of this study. Babies with ROP that were already prescribed Eylea by their doctors may also be included. The main purpose of this study is to collect more data on how safe the treatment with Eylea is in babies with ROP under a real-world setting. Another purpose of this study is to collect more data on how well Eylea works in these participants. To see how safe Eylea is, the study doctors will collect all medical problems that the participants treated with Eylea have. These medical problems are called adverse events. Doctors keep track of all the adverse events that happen, even if they do not think that they might be related to the treatment. To see how well Eylea works, the study doctors will check the number of participants: * with no active ROP after starting treatment * where ROP came back up to 6 months after start of treatment In this study, the study doctor will: * collect past data of the participants from medical records * interview the participants * collect treatment-related data during routine visits. The study duration is 6 months with 3 planned visits. One visit will be at start of treatment, one at one month and one at 6 months after start of treatment. All data required for this study will be collected during routine visits. Besides this data collection, no further tests or examinations are planned in this study.