Sedation Practice in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Treated Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Study.
Julian deBacker, Erik Tamberg, Laveena Munshi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29045280/Actively Recruiting
Led by Johns Hopkins University · Updated on 2025-12-24
6
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
52 weeks
Total Duration
Acute compartment syndrome ACS is a serious surgical emergency that can occur in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ECMO, especially veno-arterial VA ECMO. ACS happens when increased pressure in a muscle compartment reduces blood flow, leading to limb damage. Diagnosing ACS in ECMO patients is difficult because they are usually sedated and cannot report symptoms like pain. This study evaluates and compares three methods to diagnose ACS the current standard of care, the new MY01 Continuous Compartment Pressure Monitor device alongside standard care, and a 14-gauge slit catheter device with standard care, aiming to improve accuracy and early detection. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups. The standard care group involves physical exams every 4 hours and single pressure needle measurements if ACS is suspected. The MY01 group will have the device inserted into the leg near the ECMO tubing to continuously monitor pressures for 24 hours, with data accessible via a mobile app. The 14-gauge slit catheter group will use tubing inserted into the leg, connected to a monitor with pressure readings recorded every 4 hours for 24 hours. If ACS is diagnosed, surgery decisions will be made by the medical team. The device is removed after monitoring or upon diagnosis. During the study, participants will undergo regular physical exams and pressure monitoring according to their assigned group. Researchers will track the number of patients diagnosed with ACS, those needing amputation, deaths during hospitalization, and amputation-free survival, with follow-up lasting up to one year. Monitoring will include continuous or intermittent pressure measurements and clinical assessments. The study will help assess the effectiveness of continuous pressure monitoring devices compared to standard care in detecting ACS and potentially improving treatment timing and limb outcomes.
CONDITIONS
Continuous Compartment Pressure Monitoring for Compartment Syndrome in VA-ECMO Patients
H
Henry T Shu, BS
B
Babar Shafiq, MD, MSPT
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Johns Hopkins University
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | MY01 device with standard care | 14-gauge slit catheter with standard care | Standard of care |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is it? | A continuous compartment pressure monitoring system using the MY01 device, inserted into the leg on the ECMO side and monitored via a digital app for 24 hours alongside standard care. | Continuous compartment pressure monitoring using a 14-gauge slit catheter inserted into the leg and connected to a pressure monitor for 24 hours, as well as standard care. | Serial nurse-performed physical exams of the at-risk leg every 4 hours for the first 24 hours after ECMO, with compartment pressures checked by needle device only if ACS is suspected. |
| Role in the study | Investigational arm assessing whether continuous monitoring with MY01 improves early diagnosis of ACS in at-risk VA-ECMO patients. | Investigational comparator evaluating a conventional continuous pressure monitoring approach, compared to MY01 and standard care. | Serves as the control arm reflecting usual practice for diagnosing ACS in VA-ECMO patients. |
| Primary use | Provides real-time continuous monitoring of compartment pressure to facilitate earlier detection and intervention for ACS risk. | Enables continuous recording of intracompartmental pressure to support earlier ACS diagnosis and intervention. | Aims to detect ACS through scheduled physical exam by trained staff, with pressure measured only if symptoms or signs are suggestive of ACS. |
| How is it performed? | MY01 sensor inserted into leg muscle compartment by an orthopedic surgeon within 6 hours of ECMO, connected to real-time mobile monitoring for 24 hours. | 14-gauge slit catheter inserted into leg compartment by clinician, pressure data recorded by nurse or technician every 4 hours for 24 hours. | Leg examined by nurse every 4 hours for signs of ACS for first 24 hours after ECMO; pressure measured with needle device only if ACS is suspected. |
| Evidence status | Continuous digital pressure monitoring is under investigation for clinical effectiveness and safety in the VA-ECMO population; published device studies in trauma populations suggest feasibility but evidence in ECMO is limited. | Continuous slit catheter monitoring has demonstrated technical feasibility and some diagnostic value in trauma and perioperative populations, but limited published evidence specifically in ECMO patients. | Serial clinical exams with selective pressure measurement for ACS remain recommended as current standard practice, though early diagnosis may be challenging in sedated or critically ill patients. |
| Important limitations | Limited evidence exists for MY01 use specifically in ECMO patients. Device may have technical or insertion challenges, and impact on clinical outcomes remains unproven. | Potential for device-related complications such as bleeding or infection; limited comfort data in sedated ECMO patients; clinical outcome benefit for continuous monitoring is not established. | Diagnosis based on clinical assessment may be delayed in sedated or critically ill patients; sensitivity of physical exam alone is limited, especially in ECMO context. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Participants must be adults receiving peripheral VA-ECMO and sedated during treatment, without prior limb ischemia or severe trauma preventing device insertion.
Duration - Up to 24 hours
Participants have a device inserted into the leg on the same side as the ECMO tubing to continuously monitor compartment pressures. This occurs within 6 hours of ECMO start. Monitoring lasts for 24 hours, after which the device is removed or earlier if compartment syndrome is diagnosed.
1 insertion visit and continuous monitoring for 24 hours
Duration - 24 hours
Participants receive physical exams every 4 hours for the first 24 hours to monitor for signs of compartment syndrome. If suspicion arises, an orthopedic surgeon evaluates and may perform a single pressure measurement. Monitoring stops if diagnosis is made.
Physical exams every 4 hours during 24-hour monitoring
Duration - Up to 1 year
Participants are followed up for up to 1 year during their hospitalization to track outcomes such as diagnosis of compartment syndrome, amputations, and survival.
Follow-up visits and assessments as part of hospitalization care
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Number of Arms
3
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Julian deBacker, Erik Tamberg, Laveena Munshi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29045280/O Q Al-Dadah, C Darrah, A Cooper...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18656869/Andrew D Duckworth, Margaret M McQueen
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30881744/Col Patrick M Osborn, Andrew H Schmidt
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31977609/Geraldine Merle, Marianne Comeau-Gauthier, Vahid Tayari...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32074299/Eleonora Bonicolini, Gennaro Martucci, Jorik Simons...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31362770/T E Whitesides, T C Haney, K Morimoto...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1192674/Matthew A Halanski, Michael R Morris, Benjamin Lee Harper...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30473914/Johns Hopkins University
Lead Sponsor