Comparing Cryoablation Plus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Radiation Therapy Alone
for Pain Relief in Patients with Painful Bone Metastases
Led by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Updated on 2026-04-15
40
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Researchers are evaluating how well cryoablation combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy SBRT works compared to SBRT alone in relieving pain from bone metastases, which are common in advanced cancers and often cause severe pain. The trial focuses on patients with various cancers that have spread to the bones, aiming to improve pain management beyond the current standard of radiation therapy alone.
Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one group receives a single session of SBRT, while the other group undergoes cryoablation followed by SBRT within 10 days. Cryoablation involves inserting special needles into the tumor to freeze and kill cancer cells. This design allows researchers to compare the effects of combining cryoablation with SBRT against SBRT by itself.
During the study, patients are monitored at multiple time points up to 24 weeks after treatment to assess pain relief, use of pain medication, tumor control, quality of life, and any side effects. Researchers also evaluate the technical success of cryoablation and study changes in the local tumor environment. The main outcome measured is pain response at 12 weeks post-treatment, with follow-ups continuing for several months.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
Cryoablation Combined With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Painful Bone Metastases, the CROME Trial
Research Team
R
Rahul A. Sheth, MD
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match. Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
Factors
Cryoablation Combined with SBRT
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Alone
What is it?
Cryoablation uses extreme cold delivered via needles to destroy tumor tissue, combined with SBRT for targeted pain relief and local disease control.
SBRT is a form of highly precise external radiotherapy targeting the affected bone area to relieve pain from metastases.
Role in Trial
Serves as the experimental arm testing whether adding cryoablation improves pain outcomes.
Serves as the active comparator arm and represents current standard of care.
Primary Use
Evaluated for enhanced pain relief and tumor control compared to SBRT alone for bone metastases.
Used for pain relief and local control of bone metastases in eligible patients.
How is it given or performed?
Cryoablation is performed percutaneously (through the skin) using image guidance to place probes in the tumor area, followed by SBRT.
SBRT is delivered externally in treatment sessions targeting the painful bone lesion.
Evidence Status
Cryoablation has published evidence for pain relief and local control in bone metastases; combined use with SBRT is being actively investigated.
SBRT has published evidence supporting pain relief and local control for bone metastases from multiple cancer types.
Important Risks
Cryoablation risks include localized tissue injury, bleeding, infection, and rare adjacent bone or nerve damage; combining with SBRT may theoretically increase complication risk, but real-world data is limited.
SBRT side effects may include fatigue, skin changes, localized pain flares, and rare risk of radiation-induced injury to adjacent tissues.
Important Limitations
Cryoablation is not suitable for all tumor locations, especially lesions involving the spine or certain weight-bearing bones. Requires eligibility based on lesion size and accessibility. Combined therapy may increase complexity or procedural risk.
SBRT may be limited for larger tumors or lesions involving the spinal column or certain anatomic sites. Response may vary by tumor type and prior treatments.
Patient Impact
Cryoablation combined with SBRT may further improve pain control for some patients but is still under investigation; patient experience may depend on technical success and lesion characteristics.
SBRT can reduce pain and improve quality of life for many patients with bone metastases, though pain response may vary.
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
Who Can Participate
Age: 18Years +
All Genders
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
Patient has a primary diagnosis of cancer with radiographic evidence of bone metastases from specific tumor types including renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, castration-resistant prostate cancer, sarcoma, thyroid carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, or melanoma
Target lesion must be suitable for both cryoablation and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as determined by investigators
Target lesion size must be 7 cm or smaller
Pain from the target lesion must be at least 4 out of 10 on the Brief Pain Inventory pain scale
Pain must correlate with an identifiable tumor on CT, MRI, or ultrasound imaging
Life expectancy of 3 months or longer
Platelet count greater than 50,000/mm3 within 6 weeks before screening
International normalized ratio (INR) less than 1.5 within 6 weeks before screening
If on blood-thinning medications, they can be stopped 48 hours before the procedure or as allowed by the investigator
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 (Karnofsky score 70% or higher) within 6 weeks before screening
For women, evidence of post-menopausal status or negative pregnancy test if pre-menopausal
All prior systemic therapies allowed; concurrent chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy allowed
Ability to understand and sign informed consent
You will not qualify if you...
Previous local therapy to the target lesion such as ablation, embolization, radiation, or surgery
Currently receiving any other investigational agents (standard chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy allowed)
Uncontrolled illnesses like active infections, interstitial lung disease, symptomatic heart failure, unstable angina, arrhythmias, or psychiatric/social conditions limiting study compliance
Pregnant or nursing women; women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
Target lesions involving the spinal column or skull
Absolute neutrophil count below 1000/mm3 within 6 weeks before screening
Active infection at screening
Confirmed pathological fracture at the target lesion that cannot be stabilized percutaneously
Lesions involving weight-bearing long bones of the lower extremity with more than 50% loss of cortical bone
Lesions involving the hands or feet
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Treatment
Duration - Up to 10 days
Participants undergo stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) alone or cryoablation followed by SBRT within 10 days.
1 to 2 visits depending on treatment arm
Follow-up
Duration - Up to 24 weeks post-treatment
Participants are monitored for pain response, narcotic use, tumor control, quality of life, and adverse events after treatment.
Visits at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Number of Arms
2
Similar Trials
Phase 1 Study of Lutetium Lu 177-PSMA-617 With or Without Sipuleucel-T for Men With Advanced Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Phase 12a Study of 64Cu-LNTH-1363S PETCT Imaging in Patients with Sarcoma or Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer
Evaluating Safety, Dosage, and Imaging Correlation with FAP Expression
Phase II Study of Stereotactic Radiotherapy with Systemic Treatment for Oligoprogressive Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Phase 4 Safety Study of Enfortumab Vedotin Given by Infusion to Indian Adults With Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
A Phase III Study Comparing Pembrolizumab Combined with Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy Versus Standard Chemotherapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
Phase 1b2 Evaluation of Abemaciclib and Cabozantinib for Metastatic Clear Cell and Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Immunotherapy
Pilot Study of Autologous Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes LN-144 or LN-145 for Adults With Advanced Uveal Melanoma, Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma, Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, or Angiosarcoma
Study of Nerve Damage from Enfortumab Vedotin in Adults with Advanced Urothelial Cancer
Phase 1 Study of NX-1607, an Oral CBL-B Inhibitor, in Adults With Advanced Cancers Including Ovarian, Gastric, Head and Neck, Melanoma, Lung, Prostate, Breast, Urothelial, Cervical, Colorectal, and Lymphoma
Dose Escalation and Expansion With or Without Paclitaxel Combination
Phase 2 Study of Sasanlimab, Palbociclib, and Axitinib for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Published Research Related To This Trial
Safety, Efficacy, and Adjacent-level Fracture Risk Following Vertebral Augmentation and Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Spine Metastases in Patients with Cancer.