2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Michael Glikson, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Mads Brix Kronborg...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34455430Actively Recruiting
Led by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University · Updated on 2026-05-14
66
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
T
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Lead Sponsor
S
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Collaborating Sponsor
Researchers are investigating whether conduction system pacing (CSP) is as effective as biventricular pacing (BiVP) in patients with heart failure and right ventricular pacing (RVP) who need upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to compare these two pacing methods to see if CSP is not inferior to BiVP in improving heart function. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The experimental group will receive CSP lead placement, starting with left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and switching to His bundle pacing (HBP) if LBBP is unsuccessful. The control group will receive traditional biventricular pacing, involving placement of right atrial, right ventricular, and left ventricular leads using standard techniques. The study will monitor participants over six months to assess treatment effects. During the study, participants will undergo evaluations including echocardiography to measure changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), heart size, pacing parameters, and heart function classification. Additional assessments include quality of life questionnaires, walk distance tests, blood markers, and monitoring for adverse events and device-related complications at multiple time points up to six months. The primary outcome is the change in LVEF from baseline to six months after device implantation.
CONDITIONS
CSP Versus BiVP for Heart Failure Patients With RVP Upgraded to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Day of device implantation
Participants receive implantation of the assigned pacing device: either conduction system pacing (including attempts of left bundle branch pacing and His bundle pacing) or biventricular pacing using standard techniques.
1 procedural visit (in-person)
Duration - 6 months
Participants are monitored for device function, clinical status, and safety through scheduled follow-up visits after device implantation.
Visits 1 day before discharge, and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-implantation (in-person)
Total: 1 location
1
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210029
Actively Recruiting
J
Jiangang Zou
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Michael Glikson, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Mads Brix Kronborg...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34455430Mina K Chung, Kristen K Patton, Chu-Pak Lau...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37283271Laurens F Tops, Martin J Schalij, Jeroen J Bax
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19695453Gerald C Kaye, Nicholas J Linker, Thomas H Marwick...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25189602Shaan Khurshid, Edmond Obeng-Gyimah, Gregory E Supple...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29749933Peiren Shan, Lan Su, Xiaodong Zhou...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29081396Zhiyong Qian, Yao Wang, Xiaofeng Hou...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33372293Béla Merkely, Robert Hatala, Jerzy K Wranicz...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37632437