Actively Recruiting

Age: 18Years +
All Genders
NCT04909541

Development of a New Canadian Endourology Group Stent Symptom Score

Led by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Updated on 2024-06-07

180

Participants Needed

9

Research Sites

174 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

Sponsors

C

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Lead Sponsor

U

Université de Montréal

Collaborating Sponsor

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Placement of a ureteral stent is a common urological intervention. For decades there was no valid measures available to assess quality of life issues in patients with ureteral stents, which has hampered the understanding of such symptoms and their true impact. In order to improve the outcomes associated with the placement of a stent, a validated tool is needed to measure its impact and the amount of undesirable effects it produces on patients requiring the placement of a stent. In 2003, the team of the Bristol Urological Institute developed a validated questionnaire called the: URETERAL STENT SYMPTOM QUESTIONNAIRE (USSQ). The questionnaire contains 38 items included in 6 sections. Despite the obvious need of a validated questionnaire, the latter remains unused by the community of peer urologists. Many of urologists consider it too long to be used in clinical practice and even for research purposes. This issue motivated the Canadian Endourology Group (CEG) to work collaboratively on the development of the CANADIAN ENDOUROLOGY GROUP STENT SYMPTOM SCORE (CEGSSS) in order to provide clinicians with a more useful and validated tool. To fulfill this objective, the CEG proceeds in three phases. Phase 1. A systematic, deliberative, and participatory approach mostly through face to face meetings, including patients, clinicians, and researchers in the field of Endourology to identify a minimum needs-based set of domains and items that are, clinically relevant to be included in the CEGSSS in order to ensure optimal uptake in the clinical setting. Phase 2. A pilot study to assess feasibility/acceptability and further refine the proposed set of items selected in phase 1 of the study. Phase 3. A multicentric prospective study to evaluate the validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the CEGSSS. This research project is conducted by the Canadian Endourology Group (CEG), a panel of experts in the field of endourology in Canada. The CEG is a national member-based organization dedicated to enabling the profession to provide the highest possible standards of endourological care and to advance the science of endourology by collaboratively: 1. Fostering excellence in endourological practice through advocacy, education, research and practice support tools, 2. Leading evidence-based clinical practice through the development of practice standards and guidelines in endourology, 3. Providing continuous professional development for Canadian endourologists along the career-path continuum, 4. Providing leadership in public education for endourological conditions.

CONDITIONS

Official Title

Development of a New Canadian Endourology Group Stent Symptom Score

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years +
All Genders

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Age 65 18 years
  • Patient with ureteral stent
  • Ability to communicate in English
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Inability to provide an informed consent due to physical or mental inability
  • Active malignancy
  • Obstruction
  • Long-term stent (>2 weeks)

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Trial Site Locations

Total: 9 locations

1

University of California, Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095

Not Yet Recruiting

2

Cleveland Clinic - University of Toronto.

Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States, 44124

Not Yet Recruiting

3

Alberta University - Northern Alberta Urology Centre

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1Z1

Not Yet Recruiting

4

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6X 1Z9

Actively Recruiting

5

Dalhousie University

Halifax, Nova Scottia, Canada, B3H 1Y6

Not Yet Recruiting

6

St. Michael's Hospital - University of Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8

Not Yet Recruiting

7

Toronto General Hospital - University Health Network (UHN)

Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4

Not Yet Recruiting

8

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3E4

Actively Recruiting

9

Royal Victoria Hospital- McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1

Not Yet Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

N

Naeem Bhojani, MD

CONTACT

K

Kahina Bensaadi, DESS

CONTACT

How is the study designed?

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Masking

N/A

Allocation

N/A

Model

N/A

Primary Purpose

N/A

Number of Arms

1

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here