Dime La Verdad Training Community Health Workers to Share Reliable Respiratory Virus Prevention Information Using Personal Stories on Social Media
Led by University of Chicago · Updated on 2026-03-02
1400
Participants Needed
4
Research Sites
39 weeks
Total Duration
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
This research evaluates storytelling by community health workers as a way to share reliable health information on social media and encourage informed decisions about recommended immunizations in communities heavily impacted by respiratory virus infections. It aims to create a science communication program that empowers these workers to use personal stories to promote virus prevention and immunization, addressing gaps in reliable health messaging for vulnerable populations.
Community health workers in seven high-risk communities will participate in a tailored curriculum to learn how to create infographics and share personal narratives on social media to spread reliable information. The study uses a stepped wedge design where different groups of workers receive the training at different times. The program focuses on building communication skills and confidence to act as trusted messengers in their neighborhoods.
Participants will be involved in interviews, social media posting, and surveys to assess how well the health messages reach and influence their networks. Researchers will measure social media engagement, satisfaction with the training, and the uptake of respiratory virus protection strategies among followers over several years. The study also tracks the workers confidence in using social media for health communication and collects data on community knowledge and beliefs about respiratory virus prevention.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
Dime La VerDAD: Verify, Debunk, and Disseminate
Research Team
Y
Yajaira Bolanos Flores, MPH
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match. Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
Factors
After curriculum exposure
Before curriculum exposure
What is it?
A tailored program in which community health workers receive training on sharing reliable information, creating infographics, and weaving personal stories into social media posts to promote respiratory virus prevention.
Community health workers continue their routine activities and social media use without participation in the science communication curriculum. This period captures real-world information-sharing behavior prior to the intervention.
Role in study
Evaluates whether participation in the curriculum changes the way community health workers and their followers use social media for respiratory virus protection.
Serves as the reference period to assess changes in social media behaviors and community outcomes once the curriculum is introduced.
Primary use or focus
To strengthen health communication capacity among community health workers, support sharing of trustworthy information, and enhance preventive strategies for influenza and COVID-19 via social media.
Observation of typical social media information-sharing and community respiratory infection prevention practices, before exposure to the curriculum.
How is it performed?
Community health workers participate in scheduled training sessions, develop tailored infographics, and apply their learning by sharing content and strategies via their personal or professional social media platforms.
No intervention is delivered. Community health workers continue standard communication activities; data on social media use and community health practices are collected for one year.
Current evidence status
This is an ongoing clinical trial. No published outcomes from the intervention are currently available. Study protocol describes the methods and planned outcome measures.
No published results evaluating usual communication practices among community health workers prior to curriculum delivery are available. Baseline outcomes serve as a within-trial reference.
Important limitations
Curriculum impact on community health depends on community health workers’ engagement and their reach on social media, which may differ widely across cohorts and over time.
As an observational reference within a stepped-wedge design, the baseline period does not account for changes in information environment or seasonal respiratory infection risk over time.
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
Who Can Participate
Age: 18Years - 99Years
All Genders
Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
18 years or older
Fluent in English or Spanish
Provide services as a community health worker or similar designation in at least one of the seven communities with high morbidity and mortality due to respiratory virus infections
Have a social media presence (personal or work related)
You will not qualify if you...
Plan to stop working as a community health worker or similar designation before spring of 2028 (end of data collection planned)
Do not wish to participate in a social media campaign
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person or virtual)
Outpatient Treatment
Duration - Variable depending on cohort participation timing
Participants receive a tailored science communication curriculum where they learn to create infographics, incorporate personal narratives, and share reliable health information via social media within their communities.
Multiple training sessions and social media activities over several months
Long-term Monitoring
Duration - Up to 4 years of follow-up after intervention start
Participants' social media followers are surveyed to evaluate the reach and effectiveness of shared health communication posts, assessing knowledge and uptake of respiratory virus prevention strategies.
Periodic surveys conducted among social media followers
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary Purpose
PREVENTION
Number of Arms
5
Similar Trials
Study of an 8-Week AI-Guided Exercise Program to Improve Posture in Healthy Adults Aged 18 to 25
Study to Test the Safety and Effectiveness of AP1189 Compared to Placebo Added to Standard Care in Adults with Respiratory Insufficiency Caused by Viral Infection
Phase I Randomized, Double-Blind Study Testing Safety and Immune Response of Influenza Virus Split Vaccine in Adults 60 Years and Older
A 10-Week Digital Program Supporting Families to Promote Healthy Eating and Activity in Preschool Children
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of People with Asymptomatic or Diagnosed COVID-19 Infections in Shanghai
PhytoRx Families Pilot Study to Improve Food Security and Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Rural North Carolina
Evaluating Onradivir Tablets Versus Placebo for Treating Influenza A in Adolescents Aged 12 to 17 Years
Phase 12A Randomized Study of CoTend-s3BXBB and CoTend-BXBB COVID-19 Booster Vaccines in Adults Aged 40 to 64
Phase 2 Adaptive Study Comparing Multiple Antiviral Treatments for Early Symptomatic Influenza in Adults Aged 18 to 60
Study of Astepro Nasal Spray to Treat Early COVID-19 in Vaccinated Adults