Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.
Monika Ferlitsch, Alan Moss, Cesare Hassan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28212588Actively Recruiting
Led by Pusan National University Hospital · Updated on 2026-05-05
204
Participants Needed
5
Research Sites
21 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are investigating the best timing for restarting diet after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a procedure for certain colorectal lesions. While early feeding after upper gastrointestinal ESD has shown benefits like shorter hospital stays and better patient satisfaction without increased complications, no studies have yet explored this in colorectal ESD. This study aims to compare early feeding within 24 hours versus delayed feeding after 24 hours in patients undergoing colorectal ESD, focusing on early complications, length of stay, and patient satisfaction. Participants are randomly assigned to either the early feeding group where water intake starts two hours after the procedure if no issues are found, progressing to liquid and then soft diets, or the delayed feeding group which remains fasting on the procedure day and begins a liquid diet 24 hours later followed by a soft diet. Both groups undergo standard colorectal ESD and follow-up examinations two hours post-procedure to check for abnormalities. Patient satisfaction surveys and outpatient clinic visits occur after discharge to monitor delayed complications and overall outcomes. Throughout the study, participants undergo various assessments including blood tests, ECG, and imaging before and after the procedure. Researchers collect detailed data on patient characteristics, lesion features, procedural details, complications, hospital stay length, and pathology results. The main outcome measured is the rate of early complications within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include hospital stay duration and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis will compare the two groups to determine if early feeding is not inferior to delayed feeding. The study will continue monitoring participants for about one year post-procedure.
CONDITIONS
Early Feeding Versus Delayed Feeding After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 1 day
Participants undergo colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) followed by examinations 2 hours after the procedure to check for complications.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Up to 2 days
Participants are assigned to either early feeding starting 2 hours after the procedure or delayed feeding starting 24 hours after the procedure, progressing through water, liquid, and soft diets as tolerated without complications.
During hospital stay
Duration - Approximately 1 year
Participants visit the outpatient clinic after discharge to review procedural outcomes, assess for delayed complications, and complete a patient satisfaction survey.
1 or more outpatient visits
Total: 5 locations
1
Inje university busan paik hospital
Busan, South Korea, 47392
Actively Recruiting
2
Pusan National University Hospital
Busan, South Korea, 49241
Actively Recruiting
3
Kosin university gospel hospital
Busan, South Korea, 49267
Actively Recruiting
4
Ulsan university hospital
Ulsan, South Korea, 44033
Actively Recruiting
5
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan, South Korea, 50612
Actively Recruiting
S
Seung Min Hong, MD
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Monika Ferlitsch, Alan Moss, Cesare Hassan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28212588M Hirao, K Masuda, T Asanuma...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3391382T Gotoda, H Kondo, H Ono...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10502182K Hosokawa, S Yoshida
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9530352H Ono, H Kondo, T Gotoda...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11156645Shinji Tanaka, Motomi Terasaki, Hiroyuki Kanao...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22533757Eun Ran Kim, Dong Kyung Chang
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30959586Jun Watanabe, Joji Watanabe, Kazuhiko Kotani
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33261059Arved Weimann, Marco Braga, Franco Carli...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34242915Federica Canzan, Jessica Longhini, Arianna Caliaro...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38818132