Actively Recruiting
Early High-flow Oxygen Therapy With nebuLized Beta-2-agonist Using a Vibrating Mesh for the Management of Moderate to Severe Asthma Exacerbation in the Emergency Department
Led by Poitiers University Hospital · Updated on 2025-06-06
60
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
108 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Acute exacerbation of asthma represents an acute or sub-acute worsening in symptoms and lung function in patients with asthma. It is characterized by a progressive increase in symptoms of shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, or chest tightness. It is a common diagnosis in patients admitted in an Emergency Department for dyspnoea. Near 10 to 15% of respiratory symptoms in an ED are related to acute exacerbation of asthma. Treatment of acute exacerbation of asthma associates nebulized beta-2 agonist adrenergic with or without ipratropium bromide, oral corticosteroids and controlled oxygen therapy to maintain SpO2 between 93 and 95%. Treatment in the ED did not vary during last years, including for patients with a lack of efficacy after first line treatment, and exacerbation are always associated with a hospitalisation in 40% of adult patients and with mortality in 1% of hospitalized patients. Vibrating mesh nebulizers are devices using vibration to push drug through the mesh, resulting in the drug nebulization. Vibrating mesh nebulizers have been associated with better pulmonary drug delivery than jet-nebulizers, provide faster improvement in peak expiratory flow and have been associated in retrospective studies with patient prognosis, particularly in terms of throughput time and need for hospitalisation. However, no studies have prospectively compared nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device with standard nebulisation in patients with asthma exacerbation on clinically relevant criteria. Nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device may potentiate the clinical efficacy of short-acting bronchodilators, result in faster and more effective clinical improvement, and be associated with improved short- and medium-term patient outcomes. High-flow nasal cannula heated, and humidified oxygen (HNFO) is a ventilatory support which is commonly used for the management of acute respiratory failure for acute respiratory failure in intensive care units and in emergency departments. HFNO delivers high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), generates a low level of positive pressure and provides washout of dead space in the upper airways, thereby improving mechanical pulmonary properties and unloading inspiratory muscles during ARF. Consequently, HFNO is associated with a decrease in the work of breathing. During asthma exacerbation, HFNO was associated with an improvement in the dyspnea level and in the respiratory rate compared with conventional oxygen therapy. However, HFNO has never been assessed in association with nebulized beta-2 adrenergic agonist. To resume, beta-2 adrenergic agonist nebulization with a vibrating mesh nebulizer seems effective, especially compared to standard jet nebulization. In addition, HFNO is a technique that appears to be suitable for the pathophysiological conditions of chronic reversible respiratory failure, and can be used during exacerbations of asthmatic disease. The high flow rate of gas makes it possible to control the FiO2 in order to avoid hyperoxia, to generate a PEEP effect, to reduce the patient's work of breathing and the respiratory resistance, and to avoid the re-inhalation of CO2 by a dead space wash-out. In the EOLE study, the investigators propose to compare three therapeutic management strategies. One standard strategy (nebulisation with a jet-nebulizer), and two experimental strategies (nebulisation with a vibrating mesh device, and nebulisation with a vibrating mesh device in association with HFNO). The investigators hypothesise that bronchodilator nebulization with a vibrating mesh nebulizer is more effective than jet-nebulizers for the management of patients admitted for asthma exacerbation and non-responders or with lack to efficacy to initial treatment. Furthermore, the investigators also hypothesise that the addition of the physiological effects of HFNO may enhance the efficacy of the treatment. The therapeutic effects of nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device alone or with the addition of the physiological effects of HFNO could constitute a new approach to the management of asthma patients, particularly in patients who are insufficiently responsive or non-respondent to initial treatment.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Early High-flow Oxygen Therapy With nebuLized Beta-2-agonist Using a Vibrating Mesh for the Management of Moderate to Severe Asthma Exacerbation in the Emergency Department
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Age equal or over 18 years
- Admitted to an Emergency Department with clinical suspicion of acute asthma exacerbation according to GINA criteria
- At least one of the following 60 minutes after first beta-2 agonist nebulization: respiratory rate over 22 breaths/min, peak flow less than 50% of predicted normal, oxygen saturation below 95% on room air, or signs of severe asthma exacerbation (talks in words, agitation, sitting hunched forward, accessory muscle use)
- Able to give informed consent and not under guardianship or curatorship
- Covered by a Social Security scheme or equivalent
- Informed consent signed after clear information about the study
You will not qualify if you...
- Acute exacerbation of asthma in the last 30 days
- Acute asthma exacerbation due to anaphylaxis, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumonia, or atelectasis
- Serious signs such as drowsiness, confusion, or absent breath sounds
- Clinical suspicion of other causes for respiratory failure like heart failure, laryngeal obstruction, or pulmonary embolism
- Neurological failure (Glasgow score less than 13) or hemodynamic failure (mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg)
- Contraindication to beta-2-adrenergic agonist treatment
- Allergy to terbutaline or any ingredients
- Contraindication to oxygen high-flow device
- Persons under enhanced protection (minors, deprived of liberty, assessed GIR1 or GIR2, adults under legal protection)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
University Hospital of Poitiers
Poitiers, France, France, 86021
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
N
Nicolas MARJANOVIC, MD PHD
CONTACT
S
Sabrina SEGUIN, CRA
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
3
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here