Comparing Long Continuous Versus Daily Sessions of Prone Positioning for Adults with Moderate to Severe ARDS on Mechanical Ventilation

What this Trial Is About

This clinical trial investigates the best way to use prone position placing patients on their stomachs for adults with moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS who need mechanical ventilation. Researchers want to find out if longer prone sessions lasting more than 48 hours improve survival compared to daily sessions lasting 16 to 24 hours. The study also evaluates the safety of prolonged prone positioning and its impact on medical problems related to this intervention. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups one receiving prolonged prone position sessions lasting at least 48 hours and up to 120 hours until their oxygenation improves, and the other receiving intermittent daily prone sessions lasting between 16 and 24 hours. Both groups may have repeated prone sessions during the first 7 days if their oxygen levels fall below a certain threshold after returning to the supine position. This design allows comparison of continuous versus intermittent prone positioning in managing ARDS. During the study, participants will be followed for up to 90 days to monitor their clinical progress. Researchers will assess outcomes including mortality at 28 and 90 days, ventilator-free days, and hospital-free days at 28 days. Safety and adverse events related to prone positioning will also be recorded. The total participation involves receiving the assigned prone sessions during the first week and ongoing clinical follow-up to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of each approach.

Effect of Continuous Prolonged Prone Position Versus Intermittent Daily Prone Position in ARDS