Oral dextrose reduced procedural pain without altering cellular ATP metabolism in preterm neonates: a prospective randomized trial.
Danilyn M Angeles, Danilo S Boskovic, John C Tan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32103160/Actively Recruiting
Led by Loma Linda University · Updated on 2026-07-10
110
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
This research aims to understand if endotracheal tube ETT suctioning causes increased pain and stress in adult ICU patients who are intubated and on ventilators. The study focuses on measuring changes in pain using the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool CPOT and levels of blood chemicals that indicate stress and low oxygen in the body. Researchers compare patients who receive ETT suctioning with those who do not during the study period to see if there are differences in these measures. Participants will either receive ETT suctioning as part of their normal care or will not undergo suctioning during the observation period. Pain levels will be recorded before and after suctioning, and blood samples will be taken from existing arterial lines at three specific times 5 minutes before suctioning, 5 minutes after, and 30 minutes after. This procedure helps assess the impact of suctioning on pain and markers of stress. During the study, participants pain will be closely monitored using the CPOT scale, and blood samples will be analyzed for markers of hypoxia and oxidative stress such as hypoxanthine. Demographic and medical information will be collected from medical records. The study helps improve pain management approaches for ICU patients who cannot communicate their discomfort, with the total participation lasting until the primary completion date in late 2026.
CONDITIONS
The Effects of Endotracheal Suctioning on Pain and Serum Markers
B
Briana Carr, PhD(c), BSN, RN
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Loma Linda University
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | ETT Suctioning | No Suction (observation) | Supportive Airway Care |
|---|---|---|---|
| What this is | Endotracheal suctioning procedure performed to assess pain (via CPOT) and serum hypoxia/oxidative stress markers in intubated adults | Observation without endotracheal suctioning during the defined period | Ongoing airway management without protocolized procedural pain and biomarker monitoring |
| Role in trial | Investigational arm where suctioning is administered to measure impacts on pain and biomarkers | Control arm with no suctioning during observation to compare against suction effects | Represents usual care outside the trial where suctioning occurs per clinical needs without structured pain/biomarker assessment |
| Primary purpose | Assess the impact of suctioning on procedural pain and hypoxia/oxidative stress markers | Provide baseline observation without suctioning for comparison | Serve as contextual reference for typical airway care without structured pain or biomarker evaluation |
| How it is performed | ETT suctioning performed per normal care to induce pain and then measure CPOT score and serum markers before and 30 minutes after suctioning | No suctioning administered during the observation period | Supportive airway care occurs as usual without structured CPOT or biomarker timing |
| Evidence beyond this trial | There is limited external evidence quantifying pain response and biomarker change specific to suctioning in this adult critically ill population | Lack of suctioning during observation avoids procedural stimulus but lacks biomarker insight | Clinical practice relies on preoxygenation and monitoring to reduce suctioning-related risk, but pain and biomarker outcomes are not routinely assessed |
| Important risks | ETT suctioning may cause transient hypoxia, arrhythmias, hemodynamic changes or mucosal trauma | Absence of suctioning avoids suctioning-related risks | Standard suctioning performed as needed may carry similar procedural risks |
| Key limitations | Results reflect short‑term pain response and biomarkers only; may not apply to repeated suctioning or varying conditions | No-suction arm lacks insight into physiological changes that occur during routine suctioning | Standard care may vary between settings, and pain or biomarker data are not systematically captured |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - Varies by participant
Participants are randomly assigned to either receive endotracheal tube suctioning as part of their routine care or to have no suctioning during this time. Pain levels are measured before and after suctioning, and blood samples are taken at specified times to assess stress markers.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
SINGLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Danilyn M Angeles, Danilo S Boskovic, John C Tan...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32103160/Loma Linda University
Lead Sponsor