Effects of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Cervical and Scapulothoracic Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Disability and Craniovertebral Angle in Patients With Upper Crossed Syndrome

What this Trial Is About

This research aims to evaluate and compare two different treatments for adults aged 18 to 65 who have neck pain associated with Upper Cross Syndrome, a common postural disorder affecting the neck, shoulders, and upper back muscles. The study focuses on understanding which therapy better reduces pain, improves neck function, and corrects posture. Upper Cross Syndrome involves muscle imbalances that can lead to joint dysfunction and discomfort, often worsened by poor posture during daily activities or work. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive moist hot packs, cervical segmental mobilizations, and free neck exercises. Group A will additionally receive the Muscle Energy Technique (MET), which involves specific isometric muscle contractions and stretches for the cervical spine muscles. Group B will receive cervical and scapulothoracic stabilization exercises that focus on improving posture and muscle control. Treatments will be applied over a 4-week period. During the study, participants will have their pain levels, neck disability, and posture measured at the start and after 4 weeks using the Numeric Rating Pain Scale, Neck Disability Index, and craniovertebral angle assessments. Researchers will monitor changes to evaluate which treatment better helps with pain relief, functional improvement, and postural correction. Data will be analyzed using statistical software to provide evidence-based results. Participants will be involved in treatment sessions and follow-up assessments during the study period.

Effects of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Cervical and Scapulothoracic Stabilization Exercises in Upper Crossed Syndrome