Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 18Years - 100Years
All Genders
NCT05500469

Endothelial Cell Loss in Pseudophakic Patients Receiving a Paul Glaucoma Drainage Device With Its Tube Inserted in the Anterior Versus Posterior Chamber: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Led by Oogziekenhuis Rotterdam · Updated on 2022-12-13

200

Participants Needed

1

Research Sites

197 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Rationale: Glaucoma is a group of diseases characterized by progressive neuropathy of the optic nerve associated with visual field loss. Current glaucoma management aims to preserve visual function throughout life by reducing the intraocular pressure. This can be achieved by medical therapy or by surgical procedures such as implantation of a glaucoma drainage device (GDD). Conventionally, the tube of such a device is positioned in the anterior chamber (AC). Unfortunately, the presence of the tube in the AC may have a significant negative impact on the number of endothelial cells of the cornea and may even lead to corneal decompensation. Alternatively, the tube can be positioned in the posterior chamber (i.e. behind the iris). In this study, both procedures will be compared. Objective: Primary: to determine the loss of corneal endothelial cells after implantation of a Paul GDD with its tube either anterior or posterior of the iris. Secondary: to compare efficacy and safety of both procedures. Study design: Prospective, randomised, treatment controlled clinical trial. Study population: Pseudophakic patients with glaucoma who need a GDD. Intervention: Implantation of a Paul GDD with its tube anterior/posterior of the iris. Main study parameters/endpoints: Endothelial cell loss of the cornea. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: At present potential benefits and drawbacks of positioning the Paul tube behind the iris are insufficiently known, successful positioning of the tube may require slightly more surgery time and the risk of hyphaema may be higher. It is expected, that in the long run damage to the corneal endothelium is less. Risks of study-related assessments are negligible, burden is low, extra time is about 35+15+35+35 minutes (total 2h).

CONDITIONS

Official Title

Endothelial Cell Loss in Pseudophakic Patients Receiving a Paul Glaucoma Drainage Device With Its Tube Inserted in the Anterior Versus Posterior Chamber: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years - 100Years
All Genders

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Age > 18 years
  • Provided informed consent
  • Pseudophakic (have an artificial lens after cataract surgery)
  • Diagnosed with open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, pigment dispersion glaucoma, or angle closure glaucoma with a sufficiently deep anterior chamber
  • Baseline endothelial cell image of fair or good quality
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome or posterior polymorphous dystrophy
  • History of penetrating trauma to the eye
  • History of eye surgery other than uncomplicated cataract surgery
  • Presence of corneal disease
  • Presence of posterior synechiae
  • Pregnant or lactating women

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Trial Site Locations

Total: 1 location

1

Oogziekenhuis Rotterdam

Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3011BH

Actively Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

R

Rene Wubbels

CONTACT

S

Susan Marinissen

CONTACT

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

SINGLE

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

TREATMENT

Number of Arms

2

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here