Epicardial Adipose Tissue May Mediate Deleterious Effects of Obesity and Inflammation on the Myocardium.
Milton Packer
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29773163/Actively Recruiting
Led by University of Virginia · Updated on 2026-08-11
192
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
13 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are studying how to improve cardiac MRI methods to better measure the composition of epicardial adipose tissue EAT and understand its relationship with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction HFpEF. The study aims to develop a rapid 3D MRI technique that reduces motion artifacts and enhances image quality, and to compare EAT fatty acid composition FAC with EAT volume in relation to cardiometabolic HFpEF. The trial also explores how treatment with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, semaglutide SEMA, affects EAT FAC and heart function in individuals with cardiometabolic HFpEF or pre-HFpEF. Participants will undergo non-contrast cardiac MRI scans, exercise echocardiography, ECG, blood tests, and physical exams. Those with cardiometabolic HFpEF or pre-HFpEF will have imaging at baseline, after a 3-month self-control period, and again after 6 months of semaglutide treatment. Semaglutide dosing starts at 0.25 mg once weekly and is increased every four weeks up to a maximum of 2.4 mg or the participants tolerated dose over 16 weeks. During the study, participants will be closely monitored with several heart imaging tests and assessments of heart function and EAT characteristics. Researchers will measure changes in EAT FAC and volume as well as heart function indicators before and after treatment. The total duration of participant involvement includes baseline assessments, a 3-month observation period, and a 9-month follow-up after semaglutide treatment initiation, allowing comparison of imaging and functional outcomes over time.
CONDITIONS
Epicardial Adipose Tissue Composition and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
M
Medard Ng
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
University of Virginia
Lead Sponsor
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Advanced CMR for EAT Fatty Acid Composition (Trial Method) | Current Clinical Imaging of Epicardial Fat (CT/MRI) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A protocol-driven, advanced 3D cardiac MR imaging study that precisely measures the fatty acid composition of epicardial adipose tissue at baseline and after optional GLP-1RA (semaglutide) therapy in adults with HFpEF. | Current clinical imaging for epicardial adipose tissue commonly employs cardiac CT or conventional MRI to measure EAT volume or density, not detailed fatty acid composition. Such imaging is used in selected patients with HFpEF or cardiometabolic risk factors. |
| Role in study/trial | Assesses the feasibility and accuracy of advanced CMR for quantifying EAT fatty acid composition in the context of HFpEF, including changes after semaglutide treatment. | Provides non-invasive visualization and quantification of EAT properties (volume/density) to support cardiovascular risk assessment in HFpEF, but does not routinely assess fatty acid composition. |
| Primary use | Used to research whether targeted imaging of EAT fatty acids can reveal disease mechanisms and treatment impact in HFpEF. | Used for anatomical delineation and quantification of EAT to help stratify risk and phenotype in cardiovascular disease, primarily via volume or density. |
| How it is given/performed | Participants undergo cardiac MRI scans with advanced chemical shift-encoded 3D imaging at specified timepoints, including pre- and post-GLP-1RA treatment phases. | Standard-of-care approaches use cardiac CT or conventional MRI scans, performed according to typical cardiovascular imaging protocols without dedicated fatty acid imaging sequences. |
| Evidence status and maturity | Ongoing clinical investigation; results for this method in HFpEF are not yet established. Prior technical studies show feasibility and correlation with inflammatory biomarkers in other patient populations. | Substantial published evidence supports CT and conventional MRI for measurement of EAT volume and density as risk markers in HFpEF. Clinical utility of detailed fatty acid composition quantification remains to be determined. |
| Important limitations | Advanced CMR-based fatty acid imaging is not routine and requires specialized imaging protocols, technical expertise, and validation in larger diverse populations. Results are not yet ready to guide direct clinical decision-making. | Standard imaging with CT and MRI does not directly quantify EAT fatty acid composition. Volume and density measures provide surrogate insights, but their relationship to disease mechanisms or therapy effects is less specific. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
Duration - Up to 3 months
Participants undergo cardiac MRI, exercise echocardiography, ECG, blood tests, and physical exams to measure heart function and epicardial fat composition.
Multiple visits for imaging and testing
Duration - 6 months
Participants receive semaglutide treatment for 6 months, starting at a low dose and gradually increasing as tolerated, with repeat imaging and assessments before and after treatment.
Regular visits for treatment monitoring and imaging
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Number of Arms
3
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Milton Packer
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29773163/Mark Bydder, Olivier Girard, Gavin Hamilton
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21868182/Mohamed Marwan, Michaela Hell, Annika Schuhbäck...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28914752/Pierre Daudé, Thomas Troalen, Adèle L C Mackowiak...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38878970/Dimitri Martel, Benjamin Leporq, Mary Bruno...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30006022/Maryam Ebadi, Catherine J Field, Richard Lehner...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29258509/Daniela Franz, Maximilian N Diefenbach, Franziska Treibel...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30684282/Johan Berglund, Håkan Ahlström, Joel Kullberg
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22334300/Amir Abbas Mahabadi, Bastian Balcer, Iryna Dykun...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28837682/Soham A Shah, Claire E Reagan, Julia E Bresticker...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37325396/University of Virginia
Lead Sponsor
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Collaborating Sponsor