Actively Recruiting
Does ESWT With BoNTA Treatment Improve Outcomes When Compared to Standard Management for Upper Limb Spasticity Patient.
Led by University of Alberta · Updated on 2026-04-13
40
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
239 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Background Effective management of spasticity, a debilitating and challenging condition afflicting many recovering from and living with neurological conditions, may reduce long term consequences such as limb contracture, skin breakdown, compromised mobility, caregiver burden and discomfort. In rehabilitation, spasticity represents a significant barrier to successful rehabilitation outcomes. Effective spasticity management can increases the length of individual functional status, reduces equipment/care needs, hospital admissions and extends the time people can stay safely at home, which would represent an economic benefit to the health system. Extra-corporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT), an intense short energy wave delivered directly at the region of affected muscles has, in past randomized controlled studies, demonstrated positive outcomes for this population (spastic stroke population, TBI), on its own and as an adjunct to current modalities. In fact, one retrospective observational study demonstrated an increased efficacy of Toxin botulinum at 1 month when combined with ESWT. Where existing treatment options may be limited by coverage, access to delivery, complications and side effects, ESWT represents a potential to be a safe, low cost, efficacious alternative that can be administered by any trained clinician. Aims The aims of this pilot study will be to explore the hypothesis that adding ESWT to Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNTA) in spasticity post-stroke (TBI)will demonstrate greater clinical and patient reported outcomes compared to standard treatment with BoNTA alone, a comparison only once previously studied. Methods Incorporating randomization and placebo control (n= 20 in each arm), this patient-centric study will examine treatment goals and holistic perception of benefit after the treatment experience. We will use patient reported outcomes at baseline and at defined intervals after intervention. We will test our hypothesis using clinical and patient reported scales, such as the patient reported numeric rating scale (NRS) and goniometric range for spasticity as our primary outcome in conjunction with measures of muscle stiffness, quality of life, feasibility and acceptability of the protocol to help inform future study direction.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Does ESWT With BoNTA Treatment Improve Outcomes When Compared to Standard Management for Upper Limb Spasticity Patient.
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Adults over 18 years old with upper limb spasticity of cerebral origin, including acquired brain injury, stroke, or cerebral palsy
- Female participants must be post-menopausal, sterilized, or using effective birth control and willing to provide a pregnancy test
- No prior exposure to shockwave therapy
- Spasticity with a Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of 2 in the affected elbow joint
- Willing to provide written consent and able to complete simple questionnaires
- Either currently treated with BoNTA and washed out for 3 months or intending to start BoNTA treatment for the affected arm
You will not qualify if you...
- Presence of neurodegenerative disorders at the spinal level or spinal cord lesions
- Fixed contracture of the target joint or MAS score of 4
- Lower motor neuron damage in the affected limb
- Previous surgery on the affected arm that could affect assessments
- Changes in anti-spasticity or depression medications within 1 month prior to screening
- Changes in rehabilitation therapy during the study
- Pregnancy or nursing
- Female participants of childbearing age without adequate contraception or unwilling to do pregnancy testing
- Implanted electronic devices in the treatment area
- Use of Warfarin with poorly controlled coagulation or INR above 3
- Malignant diagnoses
- Active infection, inflammation, open wounds, or recent swelling in the treatment area
- Participation in any other clinical study
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5G 0B7
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
S
Steacy Wray, RN
CONTACT
B
Benoit Martin, MD
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
TRIPLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here