Study Comparing Intensive Cervical Traction to Placebo in Adults With Cervical Radiculopathy

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the impact of an intensive cervical traction protocol compared to a placebo traction in patients with cervical radiculopathy, a condition caused by nerve root compression in the spine that leads to pain and dysfunction. This condition affects about 3.5 per 1000 people and can result in time off work and costly treatments. While conservative treatments like physiotherapy and medication are common first approaches, the effectiveness of cervical traction remains debated due to varying study results and protocols. This trial aims to clarify tractions specific effects using a robust experimental design as part of a larger research effort to improve treatment recommendations. Participants will receive either an intensive mechanical cervical traction protocol or a placebo version, both applied twice daily over five consecutive weekdays with at least eight pull-ups during this period. The study is randomized and single-blind, meaning participants will be assigned to one of the two groups without knowing which treatment they receive. This design allows researchers to compare the true effect of the traction against a placebo treatment under controlled conditions. During the study, participants progress will be monitored, focusing on the Neck Disability Index NDI score to measure improvement in symptoms three months after finishing the traction protocol. Patients must meet specific clinical signs of cervical radiculopathy and have undergone recent imaging such as MRI or CT scans. Safety and adherence will be tracked, with follow-up assessments evaluating changes in disability and symptom relief. The total duration includes the treatment phase over five days and outcome measurement at three months post-treatment.

Evaluation of the Impact of Tractions vs. Placebo Tractions in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy