Using Mobile Health to Speed Access to Specialty Care for Teens 13-18 With Concussion at Risk for Long-Lasting Symptoms
Led by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Updated on 2026-05-22
210
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
17 weeks
Total Duration
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Researchers are evaluating a new mobile health intervention to improve access to specialty care for youth aged 13 to 18 who visit the emergency department with a concussion and are at risk for persistent symptoms. This study aims to shorten recovery times and ensure patients connect effectively with concussion specialists. The intervention uses remote patient monitoring RPM technology linked to electronic health records to support care handoff and reduce disparities in specialty care access.
Participants will use a chat-based RPM tool daily for up to 28 days after their injury to report symptoms and activities. If symptoms worsen or remain steady, an alert is sent to a nurse navigator who helps arrange an in-person or telehealth consultation with a concussion specialist. Symptom monitoring continues throughout the 28-day acute study period, with additional clinical visits scheduled as needed.
During the study, participants will report symptoms and activity daily, and researchers will track outcomes like ongoing post-concussion symptoms at 28 days, time to symptom baseline, clearance, and return to school up to 90 days after injury. The study also assesses how well participants connect with specialty care and gathers feedback on the interventions appropriateness and acceptability. Participation involves monitoring through the mobile tool and possible clinical visits, with data collected via electronic health records and follow-up evaluations.
CONDITIONS
Brief Title
Facilitating Access to Specialty Treatment
Research Team
M
Melissa Godfrey
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match. Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Collaborating Sponsor
How This Trial Compares With Other Options
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
Factors
Investigational: RPM‑assisted specialist access
Current usual care
What the approach is
A system where adolescents report symptoms daily via remote chat and a nurse navigator flags concerning patterns and facilitates specialist referral during the first 28 days after injury.
Typical post‑concussion care involving assessment and follow‑up based on symptoms noted during standard clinical visits without daily remote monitoring or navigator‑facilitated referral.
Role in the trial
All enrolled participants receive the RPM‑assisted specialist access intervention.
Not a study arm; serves as a conceptual comparison to usual clinical practice.
Primary purpose
To detect escalating or plateauing symptoms early and facilitate timely referral to concussion specialists within 28 days post‑injury.
Standard practice relies on symptom‑driven follow‑up initiated during clinical visits or by patient report rather than proactive monitoring.
How the approach is delivered
Participants report symptoms daily via remote patient monitoring chat for up to 28 days; escalating or plateauing symptoms trigger electronic alerts to a nurse navigator, who arranges specialist visits as needed.
Follow‑up is initiated during standard emergency or clinic visits based on symptom resolution or persistence, without structured monitoring or navigator involvement.
Evidence and guideline context
Effectiveness and fidelity being evaluated in this trial; no prior evidence of outcomes yet.
Usual care is supported by pediatric concussion management guidelines recommending symptom‑based follow‑up, gradual return to activity and avoiding routine imaging.
Important risks
Not yet established; potential risks include over‑referral or alert fatigue, but no harm data are available.
Generally safe; relies on usual clinical follow‑up with no additional intervention risks.
Key limitations
No comparison arm within the trial; results may not generalize if smartphone access or navigator resources vary.
Delayed or inconsistent follow‑up may miss early deterioration in symptoms, relying on parent‑initiated follow‑up or ED returns.
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
Who Can Participate
Age: 13Years - 18Years
All Genders
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
Males and females age 13 to 18 years
Present to the Emergency Department within 72 hours of head injury
Meet concussion criteria as defined by the latest International Consensus Statement
Own a smartphone
At moderate-to-high risk for persistent post-concussion symptoms (5P rule score >3/12)
Parents of eligible children
Emergency or specialty providers caring for patients via the mobile health care handoff
You will not qualify if you...
Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 13
Lower extremity trauma
Prior concussion within 1 month
Non-English speaking
Hospital admission at initial head injury visit
Previous enrollment in the study
Inability to complete study procedures
Non-English speaking parents or providers
Your Study Journey
Screening
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person) at the Emergency Department within 72 hours of head injury
Treatment
Duration - Up to 28 days following injury
Participants report symptoms and activity daily via remote patient monitoring chat technology for up to 28 days following injury. A nurse navigator monitors symptoms and facilitates scheduling of specialist visits as needed.
Daily symptom reporting via mobile health technology with additional specialist visits as needed
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NA
Model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Purpose
OTHER
Number of Arms
1
Similar Trials
Comparing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with Usual Care Rehabilitation for Adults Aged 18 to 49 with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Auditory Training to Improve Hearing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Adults Aged 18 to 55
Comparing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Military Members with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Postconcussive Symptoms
Study Comparing Two Remote Teletherapy Programs to Improve Emotional Health in Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Treatment Study of Personalized Augmented Cognitive Training with Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Depression After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults
Pilot Study Testing CRISP Program for Adults 18 to 29 With Ongoing Concussion Symptoms and Headache
Study of Mild Traumatic Brain Injurys Role in Brain Degeneration and Dementia Risk in Veterans
Study of Graded Aerobic Exercise to Improve Symptoms in Adults with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Persistent Post-concussion Symptoms
Study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Adults with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury to Improve Sleep and Daily Function
Automated Virtual Reality Eye Therapy for Post-Traumatic Convergence Insufficiency in Adults with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Published Research Related To This Trial
Using mobile health to expedite access to specialty care for youth presenting to the emergency department with concussion at highest risk of developing persisting symptoms: a protocol paper for a non-randomised hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.
Daniel J Corwin, Melissa Godfrey, Kristy B Arbogast...
A Randomized Trial of Incentivization to Maximize Retention for Real-Time Symptom and Activity Monitoring Using Ecological Momentary Assessment in Pediatric Concussion.
Daniel J Corwin, Julia Orchinik, Bernadette D'Alonzo...
Ecologic Momentary Assessment to Accomplish Real-Time Capture of Symptom Progression and the Physical and Cognitive Activities of Patients Daily Following Concussion.
Douglas J Wiebe, Michael L Nance, Eileen Houseknecht...