Stunted microbiota and opportunistic pathogen colonization in caesarean-section birth.
Yan Shao, Samuel C Forster, Evdokia Tsaliki...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31534227/Actively Recruiting
Led by Seeding Inc · Updated on 2026-02-24
250
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
13 weeks
Total Duration
This research aims to find out if analyzing the gut microbiome, providing education, and offering personalized advice can improve gut health and reduce early signs of immune-related conditions in infants aged 0 to 3 months born by Cesarean section. The study focuses on whether these approaches can increase helpful bacteria, lower specific microbiome patterns linked to C-section births, reduce harmful microbes, and improve the guts ability to digest human milk oligosaccharides and produce short-chain fatty acids. It also examines if these changes relate to fewer early atopic symptoms like eczema. Participants are divided into three groups one receiving full intervention with detailed microbiome reports, coaching, personalized recommendations, and educational emails a second group receiving simpler reports and basic probiotic advice with optional interpretation calls and a control group that provides samples but does not receive results until the study ends. Over 24 months, participants provide six stool samples for microbiome analysis and additional samples for exploratory study. The full intervention group also receives scheduled remote consult calls, while the limited group can choose a call with a nurse for report review. Throughout the study, participants complete surveys about the infants health, diet, and environment. Eczema assessments are done by a nurse and reviewed by a pediatric allergy specialist if symptoms appear. Researchers measure microbiome composition, specific microbial signatures, functional capacity related to digestion and fermentation, and eczema occurrence at 24 months. This study aims to show how tailored microbiome support might positively influence gut development in C-section infants and reduce risks linked to early allergic conditions.
CONDITIONS
Flourish: Exploring the Early Infant Gut Microbiome
K
Kimberley Sukhum, PhD
C
Claudia Nakama, MPH
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Seeding Inc
Lead Sponsor
Laboratory Corporation of America
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Comprehensive Microbiome-Tailored Recommendations with Specialist Consults | Probiotic-Focused Recommendations Only | No Intervention (Usual Care) |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is it? | Comprehensive, personalized recommendations for infant gut health based on the individual's microbiome, age, feeding, and symptoms. Includes scheduled consults with a microbiome specialist and ongoing educational email series for parents. | Probiotic-focused recommendations tailored to the microbiome profile using a static, laboratory-developed test (LDT) model. A one-time report may be discussed in a single consult with a nurse practitioner, but no broader or ongoing recommendations are included. | No microbiome recommendations, consult calls, or educational interventions are provided. This represents current standard care for infants delivered by C-section in the absence of supplemental guidance or microbiome testing. |
| Role in trial | Primary intervention arm: evaluates possible benefits of intensive, personalized microbiome-based education and support in early infancy post-C-section. | Secondary intervention arm: models a less intensive, scalable laboratory-developed test model providing static probiotic guidance only. | Comparator group: receives usual care. Serves as the baseline for evaluating the effect of intervention arms. |
| Primary use | To explore whether intensive, individualized microbiome-informed recommendations and education for parents can optimize the developing gut microbiota in C-section infants and reduce risk of atopic conditions like eczema. | To test if a one-time, low-intensity probiotic guidance model can affect the infant microbiome profile and associated health risks after C-section. | Serves as the untreated reference group to observe natural microbiome and health outcome development in C-section infants with no study intervention. |
| How is it given or performed? | Parents submit infant stool samples for microbiome analysis and receive detailed, tailored recommendations based on results. Study team provides scheduled virtual consults with a specialist and sends periodic educational emails with guidance. | Parents provide infant stool samples for microbiome analysis and receive a static probiotic recommendation based on the microbiome report. Optional one-time consultation with a nurse practitioner is offered. | Parents and infants undergo standard home care, with no recommendations, analysis, or additional support provided by the research team during the active study period. |
| Evidence status | The effects of comprehensive, personalized microbiome education and consult support in infants delivered by C-section are under active investigation in this trial. Prior randomized evidence suggests some microbiome-centered programs may improve cellular immune outcomes in infants post-cesarean birth, but results are not yet established for this intervention. | Single-report probiotic recommendations for C-section infants based on microbiome profile remain investigational. Prior literature highlights associations between birth mode, diet, and microbiota, but evidence for simple probiotic guidance alone is limited. | Infants delivered by C-section often show altered gut microbiome development and increased atopic risk under usual care, with no active microbiome-tailored support. Observational studies consistently note higher colonization by opportunistic pathogens and distinct microbiome signatures in this birth group. |
| Important limitations | Benefit depends on parent engagement with personalized educational content and follow-through with optional recommendations. No direct supplementation is provided, and the clinical impact of this intensity of educational intervention is not yet established. | Effectiveness may be limited by the static nature of the probiotic recommendations and lack of continued support. No experimental supplements or products are dispensed; relies on parent interpretation. | No tailored support for microbiome health is provided; C-section infants remain at increased risk of altered gut microbiota and atopic conditions under standard care. No proactive microbiome recommendations are typically available in usual care. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person or remote)
Duration - Up to 24 months
Participants receive microbiome-guided interventions including tailored recommendations, consult calls, and educational materials depending on their assigned study arm. These interventions support understanding and management of the infant's gut microbiome.
Multiple remote interactions and report deliveries over the study period
Duration - Up to 24 months
Participants continue to provide microbiome and survey data to monitor infant health outcomes and microbiome development through 24 months of age.
Periodic sample collections and surveys as scheduled
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
PREVENTION
Number of Arms
3
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Yan Shao, Samuel C Forster, Evdokia Tsaliki...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31534227/Gianluca Galazzo, Niels van Best, Liene Bervoets...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31958431/Pamela A Nieto, Claudia Nakama, Julian Trachsel...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40898384/Seeding Inc
Lead Sponsor
Laboratory Corporation of America
Collaborating Sponsor