Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes of Full-Mouth Ultrasonic Debridement for Periodontitis Comparing Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Devices

What this Trial Is About

This research aims to evaluate and compare clinical and psychological outcomes in adults diagnosed with periodontitis stage 1 and 2. The study investigates the effects of two types of ultrasonic devices used for professional dental biofilm removal, focusing on patient experience and treatment effectiveness. It is a randomized controlled trial conducted by the University of Siena. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive a full-mouth ultrasonic debridement using either a piezoelectric device or a magnetostrictive device. Both devices use ultrasonic oscillating tips to remove supragingival and subgingival biofilm and dental calculus. Before treatment, patients will receive oral hygiene instructions, and after treatment, their perceptions regarding the procedures will be recorded. During the study, patients will undergo a full-mouth periodontal assessment at the start and again three months after treatment to evaluate disease severity and treatment effects. The study will also monitor patient-reported outcomes such as pain perception, noise, and vibration sensations over approximately six months. Researchers will track pocket closure as a secondary outcome to assess periodontal health improvement.

Full Mouth Ultrasonic Debridement Carried Out With Either Piezoelectric or Magnetostrictive Device