Actively Recruiting
Glue Embolization vs Conservative Treatment for Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
Led by Tanta University · Updated on 2025-08-19
40
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
58 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
The aim of this study is to compare glue embolization and conservative treatment for pelvic congestion syndrome regarding safety and efficacy.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Glue Embolization vs Conservative Treatment for Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Women aged from 30 to 50 years
- Complaining from pelvic congestion syndrome
You will not qualify if you...
- Pregnant women at any gestational age, women who gave birth less than 12 months ago, and breastfeeding mothers
- Patients who are treated with opiates to reduce pelvic pain in the period before the study
- Patient with history of contrast allergy
- Patient with renal impairment
- Patient has alternative gynecological cause of chronic pelvic pain as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), endometriosis, fibroid, adenomyosis, ovarian cyst
- Patient underwent any previous intervention for pelvic congestion syndrome as laparoscopy or surgery
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 1 location
1
Tanta University
Tanta, ElGharbia, Egypt, 31527
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
M
Mohamed I Eleissawy, MD
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here