Renal negative pressure treatment as a novel therapy for heart failure-induced renal dysfunction.
Veena S Rao, Christopher Maulion, Jennifer L Asher...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34405731/Actively Recruiting
Led by 3ive Labs · Updated on 2026-03-19
124
Participants Needed
7
Research Sites
23 weeks
Total Duration
Patients with renal insufficiency undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass CPB face a high risk of worsening kidney function after surgery, which can lead to longer stays in intensive care, additional health problems, and increased risk of death within 30 days. Kidney problems are usually identified by changes in blood tests measuring kidney filtration. The JuxtaFlow Renal Assist Device RAD is being studied to help maintain or improve kidney filtration during surgery by applying controlled negative pressure to the kidneys collecting system, aiming to support kidney function during the stress of surgery and reduce complications. The study compares two groups one receiving standard care with a bladder catheter for urine collection, and another group receiving treatment with the JuxtaFlow RAD device. This device uses two ureteral catheters connected to a pump that applies mild negative pressure to each kidney for up to 72 hours, starting during surgery and continuing while the patient is in critical care. Treatment stops once the patient leaves critical care after at least 24 hours, and all patients have a bladder catheter for urine monitoring during this period. Participants will be monitored with blood tests measuring kidney function, including serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearance, during and after surgery for up to 96 hours. Researchers will also track any adverse events related to treatment up to 30 days, as well as kidney injury incidence and length of stay in critical care over about one year. This study aims to understand how the device affects kidney health during and after cardiac surgery and to monitor safety and recovery in detail.
CONDITIONS
Groundbreaking Renal Assist Device Intervening to ENhance cardioThoracic Surgery Outcomes
A
Allison Fenderson, RN, MSHS, CCRP
A
Alencia Washington, PhD
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
3ive Labs
Lead Sponsor
Fortrea
Collaborating Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | JuxtaFlow® Renal Assist Device | Standard Care | Automated Fluid‑Management System |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | A device that applies controlled mild negative pressure via ureteral catheters to the renal pelvis during cardiac surgery to support glomerular filtration. | Usual perioperative management without any negative‑pressure device. | Automated fluid‑management systems that dynamically balance hydration levels during surgery. |
| Role in the trial | Randomized investigational arm using RAD during surgery. | Randomized control arm receiving standard care without RAD. | Represents current perioperative kidney‑protective strategy outside investigational device. |
| Primary use | To support kidney filtration and reduce acute kidney injury risk during cardiopulmonary bypass. | To provide standard care without device intervention during surgery. | To optimize fluid balance and minimize kidney stress during surgery. |
| How it is given or performed | Ureteral catheters placed and connected to a pump delivering –15 mmHg (±2 mmHg) negative pressure for up to 72 hours perioperatively. | Standard surgical and postoperative care without catheter‑based negative pressure support. | Automatically adjusts intravenous fluid delivery in response to urine output in real time. |
| Evidence status | Early feasibility data suggests reduced AKI incidence and safety in small surgical cohort. | No additional intervention; effectiveness depends on standard AKI prevention practices. | Fluid optimization is supported by guidelines as part of multimodal AKI prevention strategies. |
| Important risks | No device‑related adverse events or hematuria reported in early feasibility use. | Risks follow usual surgical and AKI‑related complications. | Automated fluid control may reduce fluid overload or under‑resuscitation risks compared to manual methods. |
| Important limitations | Evidence so far comes from small feasibility cohorts; large‑scale outcomes not yet available. | Standard care lacks targeted device intervention and relies on general prevention bundles with limited effect sizes. | Evidence for automated systems is emerging; integration into workflow and cost may limit adoption. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person) for eligibility assessment and consent
Duration - Up to 72 hours
Participants undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valvular surgery. Those randomized to the treatment group receive up to 72 hours of controlled negative pressure delivered to each kidney via ureteral catheters. All participants have a standard bladder catheter placed for urine collection during this period.
Peri-operative care in critical care setting with continuous monitoring
Duration - Up to 30 days for adverse event monitoring; up to 1 year for critical care length of stay assessment
Participants are monitored for kidney function, treatment-emergent adverse events, and recovery outcomes including serum creatinine and critical care length of stay.
Visits and assessments at multiple timepoints including post-operative days 1 to 14 and up to 1 year
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
PREVENTION
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Veena S Rao, Christopher Maulion, Jennifer L Asher...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34405731/3ive Labs
Lead Sponsor
Fortrea
Collaborating Sponsor