Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 45Years - 75Years
All Genders
Healthy Volunteers
NCT06682650

Implementation of a ColoRectal Cancer Screening Tool in US Primary Care Practices - Usual Quality Improvement (10 Clinics) vs Normalization Process Theory-Participatory Learning in Action (10 Clinics)

Led by University of Kansas Medical Center ยท Updated on 2026-03-10

2200

Participants Needed

1

Research Sites

208 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

Sponsors

U

University of Kansas Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

N

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborating Sponsor

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Although implementation intentions (I2)-based tools enhance colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake, prior studies have not tested their implementation into routine primary care delivery. In this study, investigators will conduct a cluster-randomized trial in 20 US primary care clinics. Specific aims for the project will be: 1) to test whether a Normalization Process Theory-informed Participatory Learning in Action (NPT-PLA intervention) implementation of a proven implementation Intentions-based colorectal cancer screening tool ("I2") improves screening uptake (i.e. screening order and completion) within 6 months of patient enrollment versus usual quality improvement (control) implementation; and 2) to evaluate the facilitators and barriers of each implementation arm using the 2022 expanded Normalization Process Theory (NPT) framework. Multi-disciplinary clinic 'implementation teams' that include clinic staff and patients whose preferred language is Spanish will meet monthly during the first 6 months of clinic participation and aim to integrate into routine primary care the "I2" CRC screening tool, using the NPT-PLA intervention or control approach. The I2 tool addresses the "when," "where" and "how" details of stool sample or colonoscopy screening. The I2 tool will be delivered via an on-line survey or (if patients prefer) by paper form customized for use in English or Spanish. At least 100 patients in each clinic will be enrolled in the first 6 months of clinic participation (2000 in total). All patients eligible for CRC screening will be offered the I2 tool. Their choices will be communicated automatically to clinics for order entry. Primary (Aim 1) outcomes will be CRC screening orders placed (by clinic staff); completion of the I2 tool and CRC screening completion (by patients) over 6 months of patient follow-up. For Aim 2, surveys based on the NPT domains (the "NOMAD") will be used to assess staff comprehension of their role in implementing the I2-based CRC screening tool, its salience, their buy-in, feasibility of altering workflows, and the potential impact of using the tool in their setting. Investigators will conduct summative qualitative focus group discussions in all participating clinics after 6 months of clinic participation. The study will provide important information on barriers and facilitators of embedding NPT-PLA interventions in "real-world" primary care clinical settings.

CONDITIONS

Official Title

Implementation of a ColoRectal Cancer Screening Tool in US Primary Care Practices - Usual Quality Improvement (10 Clinics) vs Normalization Process Theory-Participatory Learning in Action (10 Clinics)

Who Can Participate

Age: 45Years - 75Years
All Genders
Healthy Volunteers

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Clinics serving communities with at least 25% Spanish-speaking population
  • Patients aged 45 to 75 years who are due for colorectal cancer screening
  • Patients who have not had a high-sensitivity fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test within the past year
  • Patients who have not had fecal DNA testing within the past 3 years
  • Patients who have not had sigmoidoscopy or barium enema within the past 5 years
  • Patients who have not had colonoscopy within the past 10 years
  • Patients who receive primary care at least annually from the clinic
  • Clinic staff who have contact with patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening
  • Patients participating in implementation teams who prefer Spanish and are bilingual in English and Spanish
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Patients ineligible for routine screening due to personal or close family history of colorectal cancer
  • Patients with increased genetic risk of colon cancer
  • Patients with cognitive or decisional incapacity, based on a Mini-Cog Exam

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Trial Site Locations

Total: 1 location

1

DARTNet Institute

Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045

Actively Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

J

Joseph W LeMaster, MD MPH

CONTACT

T

Traci Buechner

CONTACT

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

SINGLE

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

SCREENING

Number of Arms

2

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here