How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis.
Joanne Greenhalgh, Kate Gooding, Elizabeth Gibbons...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30294712Actively Recruiting
Led by University of Calgary · Updated on 2026-05-14
200
Participants Needed
2
Research Sites
34 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the APPROACH electronic patient reported outcome (ePROM) Survey and Clinician Report tools among patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and their cardiologists. This pilot interventional study aims to determine whether using these tools in routine outpatient cardiology care supports effective communication and management of symptoms, and to prepare for a larger clinical trial. The study includes both patients and cardiologists in Alberta outpatient cardiology practices. The study has two main periods: a control period where patients attend cardiology appointments as usual without the ePROM survey, and an intervention period where patients complete the APPROACH ePROM survey before their visit. Cardiologists receive training on using the ePROM Clinician Report during the intervention period, which summarizes patient survey results to aid clinical care. The intervention period lasts approximately four months or until 30 patients per practice are enrolled. Patients complete a single clinic visit during the study without long-term follow-up. Participants will be screened and recruited before their outpatient cardiology visit, providing baseline demographic and clinical information. During the intervention period, patients complete the ePROM survey online at least 72 hours before their appointment, with support and reminders provided. After visits, patients complete surveys assessing communication and satisfaction, and clinicians provide feedback on the report's acceptability and utility. The study collects usage data and patient and clinician perceptions to assess the intervention's impact on care processes and communication over about eight months.
CONDITIONS
Implementing Individualized Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
History of severe allergic reactions to study medication Currently pregnant or breastfeeding Recent participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days Presence of uncontrolled medical conditions that could affect safety
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person) for screening and enrollment
Duration - Up to 4 months or until 30 patients enrolled per practice, whichever is soonest
Participants attend their cardiology appointment as usual without completing the ePROM survey. After the visit, they complete a post-visit electronic survey assessing communication effectiveness and satisfaction with care.
1 cardiology appointment visit and 1 post-visit electronic survey
Duration - Up to 4 months or until 30 patients enrolled per practice, whichever is soonest
Participants complete the ePROM patient survey before their cardiology appointment. Clinicians receive a report summarizing the survey results to support the clinical visit. Participants then complete a post-visit electronic survey assessing communication and satisfaction.
1 pre-visit survey, 1 cardiology appointment visit, and 1 post-visit electronic survey
Total: 2 locations
1
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N1N4
Actively Recruiting
2
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T6G2R3
Actively Recruiting
S
Stephen B WIlton, MD, MSc
M
Maria E Dalton, MSc.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Model
CROSSOVER
Primary Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Joanne Greenhalgh, Kate Gooding, Elizabeth Gibbons...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30294712S Ishaque, J Karnon, G Chen...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30284183Gregory Makoul, Edward Krupat, Chih-Hung Chang
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17574367Paul S Chan, Philip G Jones, Suzanne A Arnold...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25185249You-Shan Feng, Thomas Kohlmann, Mathieu F Janssen...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33284428André Moser, Andreas E Stuck, Rebecca A Silliman...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22818947Brooke Levis, Ying Sun, Chen He...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32515813Victoria Vaughan Dickson, Christopher S Lee, Karen S Yehle...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27686630Maria Dalton, Denise Kruger, Tolulope T Sajobi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40433203