Endobronchial Valves for Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Best Practice Recommendations from Expert Panel on Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.
Dirk-Jan Slebos, Pallav L Shah, Felix J F Herth...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27992862/Actively Recruiting
Led by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Updated on 2026-04-13
20
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
N/A
Total Duration
This research aims to evaluate a new lung surgery technique called lung fissure completion with pleural adhesiolysis for patients with severe emphysema or COPD who have not improved after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves EBVs. The goal is to see if this surgery can improve lung function and symptoms in patients who still have poor breathing and little volume reduction despite previous valve treatment. The study is a pilot clinical trial focused on this specific patient group with failed EBV therapy. Participants will undergo a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery VATS or robotic procedure where the surgeon will complete the lung fissure and remove adhesions near the treated lung lobe. This involves anesthesia, small incisions, use of a surgical stapler to close lung tissue gaps, and managing any air leaks or complications. After surgery, patients will be closely monitored and receive standard postoperative care. Bronchoscopy will also be performed to examine and adjust the valves if needed. During the study, participants will have follow-up visits at 14 days and 3 months after surgery. Researchers will collect data from medical records including lung function tests, walking distance tests, CT scans, and questionnaires measuring quality of life and breathlessness. The main outcomes measured are the success of fissure completion, safety events, lung volume reduction, and improvements in breathing and quality of life. Participants will be observed for up to two years for these outcomes.
CONDITIONS
Inter-lobar Fissure Completion in Patients With Failed Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | Fissure Completion Surgery (Investigational) | Current Standard Care (Best Practice) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A minimally invasive surgical procedure using video-assisted thoracoscopic or robotic techniques to complete interlobar fissures and remove pleural adhesions for patients who previously received endobronchial valves and had incomplete fissure or limited lung volume reduction. | Ongoing medical management, pulmonary rehabilitation, supplemental oxygen, and supportive care—including monitoring, inhaled therapies, and management of comorbidities—as established by international COPD guidelines. |
| Role in the trial | Primary intervention studied for its ability to achieve more complete lung volume reduction and improve symptoms after prior bronchoscopic therapy. | Established routine management offered to patients remaining symptomatic after lung volume reduction procedures, per guideline recommendations. |
| Primary use | Intended to restore fissure integrity and allow more effective lung volume reduction in patients who did not benefit fully from endobronchial valves. | Focuses on symptom relief, maximizing lung function, improving exercise capacity, and supporting quality of life in advanced COPD/emphysema. |
| How it is given or performed | Surgery is performed under general anesthesia using minimally invasive thoracoscopic or robotic techniques, targeting the fissure and performing adhesiolysis. The goal is to complete the fissure adjacent to the lobe treated with prior bronchoscopic valves. | Non-surgical management includes inhaled bronchodilators, corticosteroids, supplemental oxygen, pulmonary rehabilitation, and regular follow-up. Patients continue medical therapy and supportive care as indicated. |
| Evidence status | Ongoing clinical study; results for effectiveness, lung volume reduction success, and impact on symptoms are not yet established. | Medical management and supportive care are supported by strong evidence from guidelines and systematic reviews; pulmonary rehabilitation and inhaled therapies improve function and quality of life in advanced disease. |
| Important limitations | Risks of surgery may include complications such as infection, prolonged air leak, bleeding, or cardiopulmonary events. The approach is investigational and data on long-term outcomes are not yet available. | Medical management may not address underlying anatomical lung changes for patients who are not eligible for further lung volume reduction and remain symptomatic. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - 1 day
Participants undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery or robotic interlobar lung fissure completion with pleural adhesiolysis to address failed bronchoscopic lung volume reduction.
1 surgical procedure visit (in-person)
Duration - Up to 14 days
Participants are monitored with standard post-operative care including chest tube management and evaluation for air leaks or complications.
Approximately 1 to 2 visits (in-person)
Duration - 3 months
Participants attend follow-up visits to assess lung function, quality of life, and imaging results including CT scans, pulmonary function tests, and questionnaires.
2 visits at 14 days and 3 months (in-person)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NA
Model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
1
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Dirk-Jan Slebos, Pallav L Shah, Felix J F Herth...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27992862/S D Sullivan, S D Ramsey, T A Lee
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10673466/Pallav L Shah, Felix J F Herth
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24008689/François Maltais
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23445862/Kenneth D Kochanek, Sherry Murphy, Jiaquan Xu...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29319473/Malcolm M DeCamp, Robert J McKenna, Claude C Deschamps...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18453353/Bartolomé R Celli, Jadwiga A Wedzicha
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31553837/Theodoor David Koster, Dirk-Jan Slebos
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27110109/François Maltais, Marc Decramer, Richard Casaburi...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24787074/Ralf Eberhardt, Daniela Gompelmann, Maren Schuhmann...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22459779/Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead Sponsor