Actively Recruiting
Laser vs Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for Difficult CBD Stones
Led by Mahidol University · Updated on 2025-06-22
60
Participants Needed
2
Research Sites
91 weeks
Total Duration
On this page
Sponsors
M
Mahidol University
Lead Sponsor
S
Siriraj Hospital
Collaborating Sponsor
AI-Summary
What this Trial Is About
Common bile duct (CBD) stones are a frequent condition that can lead to severe complications if not treated. The standard approach involves endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and stone extraction using balloons or baskets. However, approximately 10-15% of cases involve "difficult CBD stones" that cannot be removed using conventional methods. According to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), difficult CBD stones are characterized by large size (≥15 mm), impaction, multiple stones, difficult locations (e.g., intrahepatic or cystic ducts), or altered anatomy due to previous surgeries. These cases require advanced techniques such as single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) using the SpyGlass DS system, which allows direct stone visualization and lithotripsy-assisted fragmentation. Two primary lithotripsy methods are available: Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy (EHL): Uses shock waves from electrical energy to break stones. Laser Lithotripsy (LL): Uses laser energy to fragment stones through a water-mediated medium. While both techniques are effective, studies suggest LL has a higher first-attempt stone clearance rate (82-100%) compared to EHL (70.9-75%). However, EHL is more cost-effective and widely available, whereas LL offers greater precision but at a higher cost. Currently, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) directly compares their efficacy, procedural time, complication rates, or operator satisfaction. This study aims to fill that gap by conducting a randomized trial comparing EHL and LL in the treatment of difficult CBD stones. The primary outcome is the success rate of complete stone clearance in the first session, while secondary outcomes include procedural duration, post-procedural complications, and operator satisfaction. The findings will provide critical evidence for optimizing endoscopic stone management, improving patient outcomes, and guiding healthcare resource allocation.
CONDITIONS
Official Title
Laser vs Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for Difficult CBD Stones
Who Can Participate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if you...
- Aged >18 years
- Difficult common bile duct stone
- Large common bile duct stone (stone > 1.5 cm) or stone impaction or stones not removed using conventional techniques
You will not qualify if you...
- Pregnancy
- Unstable vital signs
- Severe comorbidities
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
- Surgically altered anatomy
- Unable to complete informed consent
AI-Screening
AI-Powered Screening
Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility
Trial Site Locations
Total: 2 locations
1
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 10120
Actively Recruiting
2
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 10ึ700
Actively Recruiting
Research Team
R
Ronnakorn Kongsakon, MD
CONTACT
C
Chutikarn Wittayalikit, MD
CONTACT
How is the study designed?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
TRIPLE
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Number of Arms
2
Not the Right Trial for You?
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here