Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 18Years +
All Genders
NCT07030829

Laser vs Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for Difficult CBD Stones

Led by Mahidol University · Updated on 2025-06-22

60

Participants Needed

2

Research Sites

91 weeks

Total Duration

On this page

Sponsors

M

Mahidol University

Lead Sponsor

S

Siriraj Hospital

Collaborating Sponsor

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Common bile duct (CBD) stones are a frequent condition that can lead to severe complications if not treated. The standard approach involves endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and stone extraction using balloons or baskets. However, approximately 10-15% of cases involve "difficult CBD stones" that cannot be removed using conventional methods. According to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), difficult CBD stones are characterized by large size (≥15 mm), impaction, multiple stones, difficult locations (e.g., intrahepatic or cystic ducts), or altered anatomy due to previous surgeries. These cases require advanced techniques such as single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) using the SpyGlass DS system, which allows direct stone visualization and lithotripsy-assisted fragmentation. Two primary lithotripsy methods are available: Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy (EHL): Uses shock waves from electrical energy to break stones. Laser Lithotripsy (LL): Uses laser energy to fragment stones through a water-mediated medium. While both techniques are effective, studies suggest LL has a higher first-attempt stone clearance rate (82-100%) compared to EHL (70.9-75%). However, EHL is more cost-effective and widely available, whereas LL offers greater precision but at a higher cost. Currently, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) directly compares their efficacy, procedural time, complication rates, or operator satisfaction. This study aims to fill that gap by conducting a randomized trial comparing EHL and LL in the treatment of difficult CBD stones. The primary outcome is the success rate of complete stone clearance in the first session, while secondary outcomes include procedural duration, post-procedural complications, and operator satisfaction. The findings will provide critical evidence for optimizing endoscopic stone management, improving patient outcomes, and guiding healthcare resource allocation.

CONDITIONS

Official Title

Laser vs Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for Difficult CBD Stones

Who Can Participate

Age: 18Years +
All Genders

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Aged >18 years
  • Difficult common bile duct stone
  • Large common bile duct stone (stone > 1.5 cm) or stone impaction or stones not removed using conventional techniques
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable vital signs
  • Severe comorbidities
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Surgically altered anatomy
  • Unable to complete informed consent

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Trial Site Locations

Total: 2 locations

1

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 10120

Actively Recruiting

2

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 10ึ700

Actively Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

R

Ronnakorn Kongsakon, MD

CONTACT

C

Chutikarn Wittayalikit, MD

CONTACT

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

TRIPLE

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

TREATMENT

Number of Arms

2

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here