Actively Recruiting

Phase Not Applicable
Age: 19Years +
All Genders
ID07464041

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing With a Stylet-Driven Lead Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

Led by Samsung Medical Center · Updated on 2026-03-11

200

Participants Needed

4

Research Sites

N/A

Total Duration

On this page

AI-Summary

What this Trial Is About

Researchers are evaluating the effects of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) versus conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with atrioventricular block who have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF 60%). This trial aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and lead stability of LBBAP using a stylet-driven extendable screw-in lead against conventional RVP, addressing the limitations of RVP which can cause ventricular dyssynchrony and pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, especially in those with impaired cardiac function. The study involves two treatment groups: one receiving LBBAP with a stylet-driven extendable screw-in pacing lead designed to preserve physiological ventricular activation, and the other receiving conventional RVP using a standard transvenous pacing lead. Both approaches are evaluated as permanent pacemaker implantation strategies for managing atrioventricular block. The comparison focuses on long-term clinical outcomes, including heart function and device lead stability. Participants will be monitored for one year following pacemaker implantation, with assessments including measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality rates, heart failure admissions, lead dislodgement, electrical activity markers like T wave alternans, and blood biomarkers such as NTproBNP. This comprehensive follow-up is intended to provide detailed information on the benefits and risks of each pacing method, with the total study duration extending to the end date in June 2027.

CONDITIONS

Brief Title

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Who Can Participate

Age: 19Years +
All Genders

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible

You may qualify if you...

  • Patients requiring permanent pacemaker implantation for third-degree atrioventricular block
  • Patients with first- or second-degree atrioventricular block expected to have ventricular pacing 60%
  • Patients with atrial fibrillation and slow ventricular response expected to have ventricular pacing 60%
  • Age 19 years or older
Not Eligible

You will not qualify if you...

  • Prior implantation of a cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction 50% or less
  • Indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Life expectancy of 1 year or less due to severe illness or advanced disease

AI-Screening

AI-Powered Screening

Complete this quick 3-step screening to check your eligibility

1
2
3
+1

Your Study Journey

Screening

Duration - 2 to 4 weeks

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.

1 visit (in-person)

Implementation

Duration - Day of procedure

Participants receive implantation of either left bundle branch area pacing using a stylet-driven extendable screw-in lead or conventional right ventricular pacing with a transvenous pacing lead for treatment of atrioventricular block.

1 implantation visit (in-person)

Post-operative Follow-up

Duration - Up to 1 year after pacemaker implantation

Participants are monitored for device function, lead stability, and cardiac function after pacing lead implantation.

Approximately 6 follow-up visits (in-person)

Trial Site Locations

Total: 4 locations

1

Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, South Korea

Actively Recruiting

2

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea, 06351

Actively Recruiting

3

Samsung Changwon Hospital

Changwon, South Korea

Actively Recruiting

4

Veterans Health Service Medical Center

Seoul, South Korea

Actively Recruiting

Loading map...

Research Team

S

Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD

How is the study designed?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Masking

NONE

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Model

PARALLEL

Primary Purpose

TREATMENT

Number of Arms

2

Similar Trials

Observation of Clinical Routine Care for Patients Implanted ...

Sinus Node Disease

Actively Recruiting

12 locations

The Pacing in Atrioventricular Block: a Comparative Evaluati...

Atrioventricular Block

Actively Recruiting

2 locations

Evaluation of Contemporary Cardiac Stimulation in Clinical P...

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Actively Recruiting

31 locations

Frequently Asked Questions

Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support

Not the Right Trial for You?

Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.

Already have an account? Log in here