Ropivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and clinical use.
Gaurav Kuthiala, Geeta Chaudhary
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21712863/Actively Recruiting
Led by Hartford Hospital · Updated on 2025-09-03
14
Participants Needed
1
Research Sites
8 weeks
Total Duration
Researchers are assessing pain management methods in patients undergoing vascular surgery with an open mid-abdominal laparotomy incision. The study compares a single dose of liposomal bupivacainebupivacaine mixture administered via bilateral rectus sheath blocks to the standard care of bilateral rectus sheath catheters continuously infused with ropivacaine. The aim is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and impact on postoperative complications, pain, opioid use, and hospital stay. Participants will receive either a single intraoperative dose of the liposomal bupivacainebupivacaine mixture 60 mL total, 30 mL per side or the standard care consisting of a 60 mL total dose of 0.2% ropivacaine administered via bilateral rectus sheath blocks along with bilateral catheters providing intermittent hourly boluses of ropivacaine 10 mL per hour per side. These interventions are given at the end of surgery. During the study, participants will be monitored for block-related and catheter-related complications, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain scores, opioid consumption, time to extubation, length of stay in the hospital and ICU, patient satisfaction, quality of recovery, and opioid use after discharge. These measures will be assessed up to two weeks after surgery to evaluate outcomes and resource use associated with each pain management approach.
CONDITIONS
Liposomal Bupivacaine/Bupivacaine in Rectus Sheath Blocks Versus Ropivacaine in Rectus Sheath Blocks And Catheters
A
Aseel Walker, MD
Explore thousands of other clinical trials that might be a better match.
Sign up to get personalized trial recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Already have an account? Log in here
Hartford Hospital
Lead Sponsor
This table compares participation in this trial with other options available for this condition. The information is drawn from published research and the trial’s study details and is provided for educational purposes only.
| Factors | RSB LB/B | RSB/RSC Ropivacaine |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A rectus sheath block performed with a combination of liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine, intended to provide prolonged analgesia following open abdominal vascular surgery. | A rectus sheath block using ropivacaine, with a catheter for intermittent post-operative ropivacaine boluses, aiming for continuous pain relief after surgery. |
| Role in trial | Investigational group evaluating whether liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine rectus sheath block reduces postoperative pain, opioid use, length of stay, and complications versus ropivacaine. | Active comparator group to evaluate effectiveness and safety of ropivacaine rectus sheath block and catheters in post-surgical pain management. |
| Primary use | Pain management after mid-abdominal vascular surgery, aiming to improve post-operative outcomes and reduce opioid consumption. | Standard clinical method for post-operative analgesia, aiming to reduce surgical pain and allow effective recovery and reduced opioid usage. |
| How it is given or performed | Combination of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine with 0.25% bupivacaine and saline is injected as a rectus sheath block, divided equally on each side. | Rectus sheath block performed using ropivacaine, followed by intermittent post-operative boluses via a catheter placed within the muscle sheath. |
| Evidence status | Liposomal bupivacaine is being investigated for its potential to provide longer post-operative analgesia after abdominal surgery. Multiple studies report mixed findings about its effectiveness in peripheral nerve blocks and abdominal procedures, with concerns noted about manufacturer financial conflicts of interest in published outcomes. | Ropivacaine rectus sheath block and catheter analgesia is supported by published evidence as a safe and effective method for post-operative pain control after laparotomy and major abdominal surgery. |
| Important limitations | Published reports note variability in analgesic effectiveness, with several studies showing inconsistent benefit compared to standard local anesthetics. Cost and potential for bias linked to manufacturer funding remain concerns. | Requires a catheter for ongoing bolus delivery, which can migrate or dislodge. Strict eligibility criteria exclude patients unable to receive repeated boluses or those with anatomical, infection, or weight-related contraindications. |
Disclaimer: This comparison is created with the help of artificial intelligence(AI) and may contain errors or missing information. It is not medical advice and does not mean one option is better or safer than another. Clinical trials are still being studied, and joining a trial is your choice. Please consult your healthcare professional before making any decisions.
You may qualify if you...
You will not qualify if you...
Duration - 2 to 4 weeks
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial.
1 visit (in-person)
Duration - Up to hospital discharge or up to 2 weeks
Participants receive a single-dose bilateral rectus sheath block with either liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine or ropivacaine. Those in the ropivacaine group also have catheters placed for intermittent hourly boluses.
Hospitalization period with monitoring visits during stay
Duration - Up to 2 weeks after discharge
Participants are monitored for postoperative recovery including pain, nausea, opioid use, complications, and quality of recovery up to 2 weeks after hospital discharge.
Visits at discharge and at 2 weeks after discharge
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Masking
NONE
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Model
PARALLEL
Primary Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Number of Arms
2
Have more questions? Get in touch with our team for quick support
Gaurav Kuthiala, Geeta Chaudhary
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21712863/M Rucklidge, E Beattie
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33456828/Thomas J Dutton, John S McGrath, Mark O Daugherty
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23937574/Martin P Alvarez, Katherine E Foley, D Mark Zebley...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25480622/Kelvin How Yow Quek, Darren Shing Kuan Phua
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24664392/Elizabeth W Duggan, Ratna Vadlamudi, Boris Spektor...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31361662/J Hausken, K Rydenfelt, R Horneland...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30879572/Paula Agostini, Rachel Calvert, Hariharan Subramanian...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18039692/Obaid Malik, Alan D Kaye, Aaron Kaye...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28781438/Catherine J Atkinson, Karunakaran Ramaswamy, Mark D Stoneham
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23327951/Hartford Hospital
Lead Sponsor