Laryngeal Mask Airway I-Gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector for Minor Urological Procedures Under General Anesthesia in Adult Patients: A Randomized Comparative Study

What this Trial Is About

This research aims to compare two types of laryngeal mask airway devices, the iGel and the Protector, in adults undergoing minor urological procedures under general anesthesia. The study focuses on evaluating the devices' effectiveness, safety, and any unwanted effects during these procedures. Participants will be adults who meet specific health criteria and are undergoing surgery in certain positions. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive the iGel device, and the other will receive the Protector device, both inserted during surgery. The study will measure how well each device seals the airway in different head positions and monitor the success rate and time needed for placement, as well as attempts to insert a nasogastric tube through the devices. Throughout the study, participants will be monitored for airway sealing pressure using specific measures shortly after device placement. Their airways will be assessed before surgery for potential difficulties. Researchers will document any adverse events immediately after the procedure. The study will also record the number of attempts and timing for device placement and nasogastric tube insertion. Participation lasts for the duration of the surgical procedure and immediate postoperative monitoring.

LMA I-Gel Versus LMA Protector During Minor Urological Procedures Under General Anesthesia in Adult Patients