Epping

Researchers are evaluating efruxifermin EFX in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving adults with compensated cirrhosis caused by NASH Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis or MASH Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of EFX in preventing significant clinical events such as disease progression and liver decompensation over a period of up to 5 years. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either efruxifermin 50 mg or a placebo, both given by subcutaneous injection. The study includes two cohorts one with biopsy-proven compensated cirrhosis and specific metabolic scores, and another with biopsy-proven or non-invasive diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis. The study treatment and monitoring extend up to 5 years, with evaluations at 96 weeks and long-term follow-up to track liver fibrosis, markers of liver injury, insulin sensitivity, glycemic control, body weight, and safety outcomes. During the trial, participants undergo regular assessments including laboratory tests, ECGs, ultrasounds, and vital sign monitoring. Researchers will measure changes in liver fibrosis, steatohepatitis resolution, and metabolic markers throughout the study. Safety and tolerability are closely tracked by documenting adverse events and exposure duration. The study duration allows for long-term observation of treatment effects and disease progression, with participant involvement lasting up to 5 years.

Researchers are evaluating efruxifermin EFX in adults with non-cirrhotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis NASH or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis MASH who have liver fibrosis stage 2 or 3. This Phase 3, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of EFX compared with placebo. The trial includes about 1,650 participants divided into two cohorts based on liver biopsy characteristics and fibrosis stage. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups EFX 28 mg, EFX 50 mg, or placebo, each given as a weekly subcutaneous injection. Cohort 1 will be evaluated over 52 weeks for histologic efficacy endpoints, while Cohort 2 will have assessments over 96 weeks. After these periods, participants may continue long-term treatment and clinical follow-up for up to approximately 240 weeks total. A follow-up visit will occur about 30 days after the last dose. During the study, participants will undergo liver biopsies, blood tests, and non-invasive assessments such as FibroScan and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis ELF score to monitor liver health and fibrosis. Researchers will track liver-related clinical outcomes, including liver events and survival, as well as safety and tolerability of the treatment. Participants who stop the study drug may still continue with scheduled assessments to support long-term safety and efficacy evaluations.

Researchers are evaluating elacestrant compared to standard endocrine therapies in adults with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive ER, HER2-negative early breast cancer who are at high risk of cancer returning. The study focuses on those who have had prior endocrine therapy and aims to measure how well elacestrant may prevent invasive breast cancer recurrence over five years. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either 345 mg of elacestrant daily for five years or continue their prior standard endocrine therapy, which may include an aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane or tamoxifen. The trial is open-label, meaning both participants and researchers know which treatment is given. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor cancer recurrence, survival, side effects, and quality of life. Evaluations include questionnaires on health status and physical functioning at baseline, six months, and annually for up to five years. Safety is tracked through adverse event reporting up to five years plus 28 days. The total participation duration can last up to five years with ongoing monitoring and data collection.

Heart attacks occur when a blood clot blocks the hearts blood vessels, stopping blood flow to the heart muscle. This trial focuses on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction STEMI and looks at how microcirculatory damage can be measured using the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance IMR. The study aims to find out if treating patients with impaired microcirculatory perfusion using low-dose intracoronary thrombolytic therapy can reduce heart muscle damage and improve clinical outcomes. Participants who have had a heart attack and undergone angioplasty will have their IMR measured. Those with an IMR above 32 will be randomly assigned to receive either low-dose tenecteplase a clot-dissolving drug or a placebo sterile water administered directly into the coronary artery. Patients with lower IMR will be followed in a registry. The treatment is given as an intracoronary infusion over 3 minutes. Cardiac enzymes, MRI scans, and other heart function tests will be done at various time points. During the study, participants will have heart enzyme tests at hospital admission and discharge. Those in the randomised group will receive cardiac MRI scans at discharge and six months later. Follow-up visits will occur at 30 days, then 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge to monitor heart function, rehospitalisation, and mortality. The main outcomes measured include cardiovascular death, heart failure rehospitalisation, heart attack size, and bleeding events, with safety and efficacy monitored closely throughout the study period.

Researchers are evaluating BAY 3713372, a new drug designed to treat MTAP-deleted solid tumors by blocking a specific protein called PRMT5. This first-in-human study aims to understand how safe BAY 3713372 is, how the body processes it, and how well it works for people with these tumors. The study will monitor side effects, dosage limits, and the drugs levels in the blood over time. Participants will be grouped into eight different study cohorts. Initially, there will be a dose escalation phase where groups receive increasing doses of BAY 3713372 alone to find the safest and most effective dose. Afterward, a dose expansion phase will involve more participants receiving the drug alone or combined with other treatments. Participants may continue treatment as long as it remains beneficial without serious problems. Throughout the study, participants will visit the study site multiple times before and during treatment, with follow-up visits scheduled every nine weeks after treatment ends until cancer worsens or participation stops. Doctors will perform health checks, blood and urine tests, heart monitoring, and imaging scans like CT or MRI to assess tumor status. Tumor samples will be collected, and health updates will be gathered every three months for up to two years after the last dose or study end.

Researchers are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of TAK-279 in treating adults with moderately to severely active Crohns disease, a long-lasting condition causing inflammation in any part of the gut. This Phase 2b study aims to see if three different doses of TAK-279 can reduce bowel inflammation and ulcers compared to a placebo after 12 weeks of treatment. The study also compares medical problems experienced by participants taking TAK-279 or placebo and how well they tolerate these issues. An endoscopy will be used to assess bowel inflammation. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups three groups receiving different doses of TAK-279 capsules and one group receiving placebo capsules. The treatment period lasts 52 weeks one year, followed by a 4-week safety follow-up. TAK-279 and placebo capsules are taken orally, and the study is conducted at multiple global centers. Treatment groups remain undisclosed to participants and doctors unless urgent medical needs arise. During the study, participants will visit the clinic 15 times for assessments, including endoscopies to check for bowel inflammation. Researchers will measure responses such as endoscopic improvement based on the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohns Disease at week 12 and other clinical remission and response indicators. Quality of life and fatigue levels will also be evaluated. The total study duration is about 60 weeks, including treatment and follow-up.

Researchers are evaluating Afimkibart RO7790121 for people with moderately to severely active Crohns disease. This Phase III clinical trial aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of both induction and maintenance therapy using this drug compared to a placebo. The study is designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across multiple centers. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either Afimkibart via intravenous infusion followed by subcutaneous injection or matching placebo treatments. The study involves continuous treatment through induction and maintenance phases to compare outcomes at weeks 12 and 52. The trial includes a placebo group to provide a comparison for evaluating Afimkibarts effects. During the study, participants will have regular visits for assessments including clinical remission rates, endoscopic response, symptomatic remission, stool frequency, abdominal pain, and quality of life questionnaires. Researchers will monitor various outcomes over 52 weeks and track adverse events for up to 70 weeks after baseline. This long-term follow-up helps evaluate both the treatments impact and safety throughout the trial period.

Researchers are evaluating Pumitamig compared to Durvalumab in adults with unresectable stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC who have completed concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This phase 3 study aims to assess which treatment better controls cancer progression and improves survival outcomes in this patient population. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either Pumitamig or Durvalumab at specified doses on designated days. Both treatments are administered following at least two cycles of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a radiation dose of at least 54 Gy. The study focuses on patients who have no progressive disease after this initial treatment and have good performance status. Throughout the trial, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and other outcomes such as overall survival, objective response, disease control rate, and duration of response over several years. Assessments include imaging reviewed by independent central reviewers and investigators according to standardized criteria. The study involves regular evaluations to track cancer status and safety, with follow-up extending up to approximately nine years to understand long-term effects.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of Pumitamig compared to Pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC who have a PD-L1 expression level of 50% or higher. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study focuses on patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to better understand first-line treatment options. Participants receive either Pumitamig or Pembrolizumab as the study drug, given at specified doses on certain days. The study uses a parallel design with two treatment groups to compare these therapies as first-line options. The study is planned to continue until October 2031, with treatment and follow-up periods extending up to approximately 5 years for overall survival assessments. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor disease progression and response to treatment using criteria like RECIST v1.1. Researchers will evaluate progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rates, duration of response, disease control rate, and symptom changes related to lung cancer over time. Safety and treatment effects will be closely monitored throughout the study duration.

This trial studies participants with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer. It evaluates the safety and effectiveness of pumitamig combined with chemotherapy compared to bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy. The study includes participants who do not have specific genetic markers like dMMR, MSI-H, or BRAF V600E mutations, which may affect treatment response. Participants receive treatment with study drugs such as pumitamig, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy regimens including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and CAPOX. The treatments are given at specified doses on specific days. The study uses a randomized, double-blind design with multiple experimental and comparator arms to assess these combinations. Throughout the study, participants undergo regular assessments to measure tumor response and survival outcomes. Key evaluations include imaging tests using RECIST v1.1 criteria, monitored by both investigators and independent reviewers, over a period of up to 5 years. Researchers track objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival to determine treatment outcomes and safety.