Tignamar

Researchers are evaluating Pumitamig compared to Durvalumab in adults with unresectable stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC who have completed concurrent chemoradiation therapy. This phase 3 study aims to assess which treatment better controls cancer progression and improves survival outcomes in this patient population. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either Pumitamig or Durvalumab at specified doses on designated days. Both treatments are administered following at least two cycles of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a radiation dose of at least 54 Gy. The study focuses on patients who have no progressive disease after this initial treatment and have good performance status. Throughout the trial, participants will be monitored for progression-free survival and other outcomes such as overall survival, objective response, disease control rate, and duration of response over several years. Assessments include imaging reviewed by independent central reviewers and investigators according to standardized criteria. The study involves regular evaluations to track cancer status and safety, with follow-up extending up to approximately nine years to understand long-term effects.

Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of Pumitamig compared to Pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC who have a PD-L1 expression level of 50% or higher. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study focuses on patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to better understand first-line treatment options. Participants receive either Pumitamig or Pembrolizumab as the study drug, given at specified doses on certain days. The study uses a parallel design with two treatment groups to compare these therapies as first-line options. The study is planned to continue until October 2031, with treatment and follow-up periods extending up to approximately 5 years for overall survival assessments. During the study, participants will have regular assessments to monitor disease progression and response to treatment using criteria like RECIST v1.1. Researchers will evaluate progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rates, duration of response, disease control rate, and symptom changes related to lung cancer over time. Safety and treatment effects will be closely monitored throughout the study duration.